In the refugee misinformation case, what role did Facebook’s design play?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question restatement: In the refugee misinformation case, what role did Facebook’s design play?

Option 1: 'It filtered out hate speech' — This would imply the platform inherently removed harmful content effectively. In many analyses of misinformation cases, automated filtering alone did not reliably filter all hate speech or misinformation, and limitations or gaps often allowed problematic content to persist. Therefore this statement overstates the platform’s filtering capabilities.

Option 2: 'It auto-corrected misinformation' — The idea here is that the system would correct false information automatically. In practice, platforms rarely auto-correct misinformation; they may label or downrank content, but automatic correction by the system is not a typical design feature that prevents spread. This makes the option inaccurate in describing Facebook’s design in such contexts.

Option 3: 'It enabled rapid spread of false rumors' — This option points to a design aspect that facilitates sharing and amplification, such as algorithmic ranking, feed mechanics, or ease of re-sharing, which can accelerate the dissemination of misinformation. In discussions of platform design and misinformation, this is the commonly highlighted role: the design choices can unintentionally boost the visibility of false content, leading to rapid spread.

Option 4: 'It blocked low-quality content' — Blocking low-quality content would be the opposite of enabling rapid spread. If the claim were true, it would suggest the platform was effective at suppressing questionable material, which contradicts typical critiques of design contributing to misinformation diffusion. Hence this option is not consistent with the described role in the case.

In summary, evaluating the options against what is typically observed in misinformation analyses: filtering and auto-correction claims (Options 1 and 2) describe active mitigation features that were not the central role highlighted; blocking low-quality content (Option 4) describes a suppressive function that would reduce spread rather than enable it. The characterization that aligns with the case’s emphasis on design contributing to rapid dissemination is that the design enabled rapid spread of false rumors (Option 3).

3600 Attendance Quiz 10

In the refugee misinformation case, what role did Facebook’s design play?

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Which factor best explains the rapid and widespread spread of misinformation on digital platforms?

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

Under the assumptions used in cost-volume-profit analysis, as the activity increases:

The CVP and break-even analysis are supported by a range of important assumptions. Which of the following is not an assumption of the CVP:

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler