"Bean There, Done That," a small independent coffee shop, is facing growing pains, including long wait times and lack of customer data. They have a limited staff (4 employees) and budget ($500). A nearby competitor has launched an app with loyalty points and online ordering. The cafe needs to quickly implement a solution to address wait times and competition but cannot afford big systems that may fail and needs fast, low-risk experimentation. Which approach would be the most sensible first step for the cafe, aligning with methodologies suitable for limited resources and needing to test ideas quickly?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The scenario presents a small cafe with limited staff and budget, needing a quick, low-risk way to test ideas against a local competitor.
Option 1: 'Wait until more funding is available to build a complex system that addresses all pain points simultaneously' suggests delaying action until a large, coordinated solution can be built. This ignores the cafe's immediate pain points (long wait times and data/loyalty gaps) and risks missed opportunities to learn quickly from customers. It also contradicts the need for fast, low-risk experimentation with limited resources.
Option 2: 'Hire a large IT consulting firm to design a comprehensive enterprise system using Rational Unified Process (RUP)' would likely be costly, slow, and produce a heavyweight solution that exceeds the cafe’s needs. The RUP is an expansive, formal software development methodology intended for larger organizations, not for a 4-person team with a $500 budget, making it inappropriate for rapid, iterative testing.
Option 3: 'Develop a Minimum Viable Product (MVP), such as a Google Form for pre-ordering or a simple paper loyalty card' aligns well with the constraints. It focuses on validating core value quickly and cheaply, enabling the cafe to test demand, streamline ordering, and start collecting customer data without large investments. This approach supports rapid learning cycles and incremental improvements, which is ideal for a small operation experimenting under budget constraints.
Option 4: 'Implement a full, custom-built mobile ordering and loyalty app using the Waterfall methodology' implies a large, upfront, sequential development process that is slow and inflexible. For a small business needing quick results and the ability to adapt based on feedback, Waterfall’s rigidity and long timelines are a poor fit. A full app is also likely to exceed the immediate budget and staff capacity, delaying benefits rather than delivering them soon.
In summary, options 1 and 2 and 4 all present high costs, long timelines, or mismatched methodologies for a small shop with limited resources. Option 3 stands out as the practical choice that enables rapid experimentation, low risk, and a path toward learning what customers actually respond to, with minimal upfront investment.

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

In a lecture, we discussed having a Cost Structure that allows you to build your MVP. In this instance, MVP stood for Minimum Value Product?

In the Food Truck Challenge, the pushcart offered: (select all that apply)

A manually delivered service pretending to be automated is called the _____ MVP.

What is the primary goal of creating an MVP?

"MVP" stands for

"MVP" stands for

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler