Question at position 19 It only talks about how to study nature with cameras and microscopes.It includes everything that can be physically measured and observed.It's the study of physics and how it can be used in current technology.It refers to parts of nature that people can't see or touch but still exist.It is an extension of physics which is learnt at the university level.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

We begin by restating the question and listing all answer options to set the context for evaluation.
Question: It only talks about how to study nature with cameras and microscopes. It includes everything that can be physically measured and observed. It's the study of physics and how it can be used in current technology. It refers to parts of nature that people can't see or touch but still exist. It is an extension of physics which is learnt at the university level.
Answer options:
1) It only talks about how to study nature with cameras and microscopes.
2) It includes everything that can be physically measured and observed.
3) It's the study of physics and how it can be used in current technology.
4) It refers to parts of nature that people can't see or touch but still exist.
5) It is an extension of physics which is learnt at the university level.

Now, let's analyze each option in turn, highlighting why some are plausible but ultimately incorrect, and why the correct one aligns with the intended concept.

Option 1: 'It only talks about how to study nature with cameras and microscopes.' This choice narrows the scope to a specific set of tools (cameras and microscopes) and suggests a limited method. In real discussions of metaphysics or science studies, metaphysics is not constrained to particular instruments or observational methods, so this statement is overly narrow and ignores other ways nature is studied or understood. Therefore, this option is inaccurate as a definition.

Option 2: 'It includes everything that can be physically measured and observed.' This claim equates the subject with all measurable and observable phenomena. While measurement and observation are central to empirical science, this description resembles the domain of physics or natural science in a general sense, not metaphysics. Metaphysics concerns the nature of reality beyond or not fully captured by physical measurement, so this option incorrectly oversimplifies or redefines the field beyond metaphysical scope.

Option 3: 'It's the study of physics and how it can be used in current technology.' This describes applied physics or the field of tech-related physical science, not metaphysics. Metaphysics deals with questions about existence, reality, and properties beyond empirical physics, whereas this option ties the concept directly to physics and technology. Hence, it is not an appropriate definition of metaphysics.

Option 4: 'It refers to parts of nature that people can't see or touch but still exist.' This statement captures a philosophical notion that there are aspects of reality (such as theoretical entities, abstract properties, or deeper aspects of nature) beyond direct perception. It aligns with the core idea of metaphysics, which investigates realities beyond sensory experience. This option correctly reflects the concept by emphasizing unseen yet real aspects.

Option 5: 'It is an extension of physics which is learnt at the university level.' While metaphysics is a philosophical field studied at university level, describing it merely as 'an extension of physics' is inappropriate. Metaphysics is not merely an extension of physics; it sits at the intersection of philosophy and foundational questions about reality that physics does not fully address. Thus, this framing is misleading and inaccurate.

In summary, the incorrect options either mischaracterize metaphysics as instrument-specific, as a comprehensive description of all measurable phenomena, as a branch of applied physics, or as a university-level extension of physics. The correct option identifies metaphysics as dealing with aspects of reality that are not observable or touchable yet are considered to exist, which captures the essential aim of metaphysical inquiry.

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Question at position 54 epistemology; Aristotlemetaphysics; Aristotlemetaphysics; Socratesepistemology; Pythagorasmetaphysics; Pythagoras

Question at position 42 TrueFalse

Question at position 59 metaphysics; Socratesepistemology; Aristotlemetaphysics; Aristotleepistemology; Pythagorasmetaphysics; Pythagoras

Question at position 54 TrueFalse

Question at position 15 EpistemologyEthicsLogicAestheticsMetaphysics

What term is used to refer to everything that is out of the ordinary?

What term is used to refer to everything that is out of the ordinary?

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler