Question29 According to the metacognitive model of worry, what is the primary driver in changing from Type 1 worry to Type 2 worry? The stimulus. All of the components of emotion play a role. Behaviours. Negative metacognitions. ResetMaximum marks: 1 Flag question undefined

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

In this question, we’re examining the metacognitive model of worry and what toggles worry from Type 1 to Type 2.
Option 1: 'The stimulus.' This suggests that external triggers or the initial provoking event drive the shift from Type 1 to Type 2 worry. While stimuli can initiate worry, the metacognitive framework emphasizes the appraisal and regulation of thoughts about thinking (metacognition) rather than the external stimulus itself as the primary driver of switching types.
Option 2: 'All of the components of emotion play a role.' This statement casts a broad net, implying every emotional component is equally responsible for the switch. However, the metacognitive model focuses on higher-order beliefs about thinking (metacognitions) that determine when worry escalates, rather than attributing the change to the entire constellation of emotional processes.
Option 3: 'Behaviours.' This option points to observable actions as the key driver of shifting from Type 1 to Type 2 worry. In metacognitive theory, behavior can influence worry through avoidance or coping strategies, but the central mechanism is not the behavior alone; it’s about the beliefs regarding worry and control (metacognitions) that govern those behaviors.
Option 4: 'Negative metacognitions.' This option identifies beliefs about worry itself (e.g., danger of worrying, uncontrollability, the need to worry) as the primary driver for moving from Type 1 (brief, incidental worry) to Type 2 (ongoing, uncontrollable worry). In the metacognitive model of worry, such negative metacognitive beliefs are the critical factor that escalates and sustains worry by shaping monitoring, appraisal, and control strategies, thereby transforming the nature of worry over time.
Overall, the reasoning aligns with the idea that higher-order beliefs about thinking—especially negative beliefs about the consequences or uncontrollability of worry—are the key determinants in the transition between worry types, rather than solely external stimuli, a blanket claim about all emotional components, or the behaviors themselves. The emphasis rests on how we think about our thinking and how those beliefs drive subsequent worry processes.

Question29 According to the metacognitive model of worry, what is the primary driver in changing from Type 1 worry to Type 2 worry? The stimulus. All of the components of emotion play a role. Behaviours. Negative metacognitions. ResetMaximum marks: 1 Flag question undefined

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Which strategy requires students to consider their strengths and weaknesses?

Metacognition refers to:

Metacognition is _____.

Question43 Which of these is NOT a positive metacognition about worry? Worry helps problem-solving. Worry is helpful for avoiding bad things. Worry can become uncontrollable. Worry is a good way to distract yourself from difficult situations. ResetMaximum marks: 1 Flag question undefined

What does the number 2nd refer to?

I stop and go back over new information that is not clear.

I ask myself if I learned as much as I could have once I finish a task.

I reevaluate my assumptions when I get confused.

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler