I stop and go back over new information that is not clear.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

First, consider the overall question: 'I stop and go back over new information that is not clear.' This describes a behavior pattern related to how someone handles unclear material.

Option a: 'Not at all typical of me.' This asserts that stopping to review unclear information does not occur for this person. If we interpret the statement as a descriptor of behavior in learning or processing information, saying it is not typical would mean the person never revisits unclear material, which contradicts the described action of going back to review. The reasoning here would mark this as a low or absent frequency of the behavior.

Option b: 'Slightly typical of me.' This implies a small tendency to repeat or review unclear information, but not strongly. It would indicate the behavior happens infrequently or with minimal emphasis.

Option c: 'Somewhat typical of me.' This suggests a moderate tendency to pause and re-check unclear material, indicating a noticeable but not dominant pattern in the person’s approach.

Option d: 'Fairly typical of me.' This conveys a relatively strong tendency to review unclear information, showing the behavior is common and regularly employed in many learning moments.

Option e: 'Completely typical of me.' This presents the behavior as pervasive and universal in all contexts, implying the person always stops and rechecks unclear information in every situation.

When evaluating, think about how often someone would engage in re-reading or rechecking unclear material in typical learning scenarios. If a person rarely or never revisits unclear information, option a would align with that infrequent tendency; if the person often engages in revisiting unclear content, options toward the higher end (d or e) would fit better. The contrast among choices lies in the degree of frequency from not typical to completely typical, and the correct option should match the observed frequency described in the stem. The other options (b, c, d, e) progressively increase the stated frequency, each representing a different level of typicality rather than an absolute assertion.

Note: The wording across options uses ordinal labels (Not at all, Slightly, Somewhat, Fairly, Completely) to convey a spectrum of typicality, so ensure you map the described behavior to the closest level of frequency rather than a simple yes/no judgment.

My LMS Subjects Metacognitive Awareness Inventory Pt 2 Regulation of Cognition

I stop and go back over new information that is not clear.

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Which strategy requires students to consider their strengths and weaknesses?

Metacognition refers to:

Metacognition is _____.

Question43 Which of these is NOT a positive metacognition about worry? Worry helps problem-solving. Worry is helpful for avoiding bad things. Worry can become uncontrollable. Worry is a good way to distract yourself from difficult situations. ResetMaximum marks: 1 Flag question undefined

Question29 According to the metacognitive model of worry, what is the primary driver in changing from Type 1 worry to Type 2 worry? The stimulus. All of the components of emotion play a role. Behaviours. Negative metacognitions. ResetMaximum marks: 1 Flag question undefined

What does the number 2nd refer to?

I ask myself if I learned as much as I could have once I finish a task.

I reevaluate my assumptions when I get confused.

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler