According to Kotler et al. (2014; 2018) in the context of ‘Market positioning and differentiation’ which of these three positioning strategies is the most promising?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question asks which of the three positioning strategies is considered the most promising according to Kotler et al. (2014; 2018) in the context of Market positioning and differentiation.

Option a: 'More for the same' — This strategy implies offering more features or benefits while keeping the same price as competitors. While appealing to value-conscious consumers, it can be difficult to sustain if competitors imitate and costs rise. The critique here is that achieving meaningful differentiation at a constant price may require substantial cost investments or unique capabilities, which may not always be scalable.

Option b: 'More for less' — This approach promises greater value (more benefits) at a lower price. It is often described as highly attractive to consumers because it combines superior perceived value with cost savings, potentially creating a competitive edge. The challenge lies in maintaining profitability while reducing price; firms must achieve operational efficiencies, scalable advantages, or cost leadership in ways that others cannot easily replicate. Kotler and colleagues often highlight this as a highly desirable positioning due to its strong consumer appeal and potential to disrupt market norms, though it requires rigorous execution and sustainable cost advantages.

Option c: 'Same for less' — This strategy offers lower price for the same level of benefits. While it is a straightforward form of price-based differentiation, it typically reduces margins and may invite a price war. It can be a viable entry or defense strategy, but it may not create strong differentiation beyond price, making it easier for competitors to imitate and erode profitability over time.

In evaluating these options, one weighs the strength of the promised value against the cost to deliver and the sustainability of the advantage. The 'more for less' proposition is often highlighted as the most compelling because it elevates perceived value while reducing buyer costs, albeit with stringent requirements to preserve margins. The other two options either risk commoditization without substantial differentiation (same for less) or rely on enhanced benefits without a price reduction, which may not be as disruptive or attractive in all contexts. Overall, this framing points toward option b as the standout if a firm can achieve the underlying efficiency or innovation that makes 'more for less' feasible in practice.

252_2HO003_Marketing

According to Kotler et al. (2014; 2018) in the context of ‘Market positioning and differentiation’ which of these three positioning strategies is the most promising?

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

According to Kotler et al. (2014; 2018), in the context of ‘Market positioning and differentiation’, the best positioning strategy for long term goal is ‘More for Less’.

According to Kotler et al. (2014; 2018), in the context of ‘Market positioning and differentiation’, consumers position products with or without the help of the marketers.

Market positioning involves a process of defining the marketing mix variables so that the target customers Blank ______.

Market positioning is done so that the target customers have an understanding of the product offered by the company in comparison with Blank ______ products.

__________ involves the process of defining the marketing mix variables so that target customers have a clear, distinctive, desirable understanding of what the product does or represents in comparison with competing products.

For each target market, Showall Corporation, a manufacturer of imaging equipment, will engage in positioning, adjusting its marketing mix variables in order to give customers

There are many different types of cars available to consumers. However, Tesla developed innovative, battery-operated, and high-end cars that appeal to consumers who care about environmental sustainability. Tesla’s strategy would be described as ________ Blank positioning.

________ involves differentiating a market offering to occupy a clear, distinctive, and desirable place relative to competing products in the minds of target consumers.

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler