Which of the following is NOT a consequence of chronic malnutrition?

Question

Which of the following is NOT  a consequence of chronic malnutrition?

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question asks: Which of the following is NOT a consequence of chronic malnutrition?

First, note that the provided data shows the answer as "Increased energy levels" but the list of answer options is missing. Without the full set of options, we cannot analyze each alternative precisely. Nevertheless, we can reason about the concept itself.

Understanding chronic malnutrition: When the body receives insufficient or unbalanced nutrients over a long period, several adverse effects typically arise. Common consequences include fatigue and weakness due to reduced energy availability, stunted growth in children, impaired immune function leading to more infections, anemia from iron or other nutrient deficiencies, poor wound healing, muscle wasting, and cognitive or developmental delays. These outcomes reflect the body’s inability to sustain normal physiological and metabolic processes under nutrient stress.

About the option "Increased energy levels": This would be inconsistent with chronic malnutrition. Inadequate caloric intake and nutrient deficiencies generally reduce energy, not increase it. If someone reports higher energy levels in the context of chronic malnutrition, it may indicate an incorrect interpretation, a temporary compensatory feeling, or a misattribution rather than a true physiological consequence.

Given the absence of the other choices, we can still evaluate the plausibility of the stated option: since increased energy levels are not a characteristic outcome of chronic malnutrition, this option would be the one that does not fit the typical pattern of consequences.

In a full analysis with all options present, each choice would be weighed: choices describing fatigue, stunting, infections, or anemia would be typical incorrect (i.e., truly consequences) options, while the one describing increased energy would be the NOT a consequence. If any option suggested improved growth or enhanced immune competence, those would also be incorrect in the context of malnutrition.

Overall, the core reasoning is that chronic malnutrition undermines energy availability and functional capacity, so outcomes like higher energy are not aligned with its physiological effects.

Which of the following is NOT a consequence of chronic malnutrition?

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Which statement about malnutrition is false?

Which statement about malnutrition is false?

Which statement about malnutrition is false?

Which of the following is true about the effects of undernutrition in poor countries?

Q13. Which of these are NOT typical of nutrition-related problems found PRIOR to the start of Epidemiologic Transition?

Which statement about malnutrition in the United States is correct?

Malnutrition is defined as:

An important cause of underweight in some poor nations is _____.

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler