Which of the following is not part of China’s macro-prudential policy?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The task presents a question and a list of answer options, but in this case the answer_options field is empty, which means we do not have the full set of choices to compare. Without all the options, a student cannot assess which statement is not part of China’s macro-prudential policy, because the correct identification typically depends on evaluating each listed option against the known components of macro-prudential policy.

What we can analyze from the available data:
- The prompt asks about macro-prudential policy in China, which typically includes tools designed to limit systemic risk and build financial system resilience. Common macro-prudential instruments include countercyclical capital buffers, dynamic provisioning, sectoral limits, housing/credit controls, cross‑border liquidity measures, and macroprudential assessments. In many jurisdictions, broad capital adequacy rules (often considered microprudential or bank-specific rather than macro-prudential) are still related to overall resilience but are not always categorized as macro-prudential policy tools.
- An item mentioning an increase in the first-tier capital adequacy ratio (CAR) from 4% to 6% sounds like a capital adequacy requirement for banks. CAR is typically viewed as a prudential regulation aimed at bank soundness. Depending on curricular framing, it could be considered microprudential (applied to individual banks) rather than macro-prudential (designed to address system-wide risk). However, some analyses might discuss capital requirements within a macro-prudential toolkit if they are used to dampen systemic risk.

Because there are no other options to compare against, we cannot definitively determine which statement is not part of China’s macro-prudential policy. The missing options prevent a complete analysis of which choice is the outlier.

If we had the full list of options, a robust approach would be:
- For each option, classify it as macro-prudential, microprudential, or neither, based on standard definitions and the specific policy framework used in China.
- Identify the option that does not fit the macro-prudential category, explaining why it belongs to another category (or why it is not a formal tool in the macro-prudential toolkit).

In summary, with the given data, a definitive determination cannot be made because the essential set of answer choices to compare is missing. The single provided option description (increase the first-tier CAR from 4% to 6%) would require contrast with other options to judge whether it is part of macro-prudential policy, macroprudential measures, or microprudential controls.

SP25_ECON_363_1 Problem set for week 7

Which of the following is not part of China’s macro-prudential policy?

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

APRA's macro-prudential toolkit DOES NOT include...

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

Under the assumptions used in cost-volume-profit analysis, as the activity increases:

The CVP and break-even analysis are supported by a range of important assumptions. Which of the following is not an assumption of the CVP:

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler