Which of the following is not a recommended source for an academic literature review?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

In evaluating sources for an academic literature review, we consider credibility, peer review, and the role of each type of publication.
Option a: 'a. Peer-reviewed journal articles' are typically central to literature reviews because they have undergone formal scrutiny by experts and provide empirical results, methods, and discussions that support scholarly work.
Option b: 'b. Academic books' are usually authored by recognized scholars and editors, offer comprehensive treatments of topics, and are commonly cited in literature reviews as authoritative sources or syntheses of a field.
Option c: 'c. Conference papers' can be valuable for timely or cutting-edge research, presenting new findings, methods, or ideas that may later appear in journals; they are frequently cited, especially in fast-moving disciplines, though they may be shorter or less polished than journal articles.
Option d: 'd. Wikipedia' is a publicly edited encyclopedia. While it can provide quick overviews and lead you to primary sources, it is not typically considered a reliable or citable source for a scholarly literature review because its content can be uneven in quality and lacks the formal editorial and peer-review processes used in academic publishing.
Thus, the statement in option d is not a recommended source for an academic literature review, due to concerns about reliability, verifiability, and scholarly rigor. However, the remaining options (a, b, and c) are commonly appropriate to consult or cite in a literature review, depending on the context and quality of the sources.

FOUND304-25B (HAM) - Research Methods

Which of the following is not a recommended source for an academic literature review?

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

By definition, a literature review involves a thorough look at the major written works (research etc,) about your narrow topic.

While sometimes a literature review will have an introduction, body and conclusion structure, it is more common to structure it according to the topic.

A literature review should be written as a neutral document that almost never has a position statement.

A literature review is a critical evaluation, not just a summary of existing research.

A well-written literature review helps identify gaps in existing research and justifies the need for new studies.

A literature review can help to:

Which of the following best describes the purpose of a literature review? A literature review for a field of research ...

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler