17. According to the lecturer, a study of the history of vernacular architecture would

Question

17.  According to the lecturer, a study of the history of vernacular architecture would

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question restatement: The lecturer’s view on studying the history of vernacular architecture is being evaluated across four statements.

Option 1: 'reveal interesting information.' This is plausible because historical study often uncovers details about people, materials, methods, and cultural contexts that are indeed interesting and illuminating. However, this option frames the study’s purpose as only about interesting facts, which may understate the broader analytical aims in historiography and theory-building.

Option 2: 'show that this is not a new theory.' This aligns with a common historian’s insight: vernacular architecture as a concept and practice has roots that predate modern discourse, so examining history can demonstrate that ideas about vernacular design aren’t novel. This interpretation emphasizes the continuity and longevity of the concept across time and cultures, countering the notion that it’s a recent or original theory.

Option 3: 'help define vernacular architecture.' While historical study can inform and refine definitions by tracing usage and evolving meanings, it may not on its own provide a formal or universally accepted definition. Definitions often require synthesis from theory, typology, and descriptive analysis, not solely historical narration.

Option 4: 'provide a definition of vernacular architecture.' Similar to option 3, a history-focus might contribute to understanding what vernacular architecture encompasses, but providing a fixed, definitive definition typically requires broader theoretical framing and consensus across sources; history alone may be insufficient for a formal definition.

Brief comparison and nuance: Option 1 foregrounds the anecdotal and informational value of history, which is valid but incomplete as a sole purpose. Option 2 emphasizes a theoretical and historiographic insight about novelty, which can be a distinct and defensible takeaway. Options 3 and 4 assign a definitional outcome to historical study, but definitions usually emerge from a combination of historical description and theoretical synthesis rather than history alone.

In summary, each option highlights a potential takeaway from studying the history of vernacular architecture, with Option 2 offering a clear stance about novelty of the theory, while Options 3 and 4 overstate the definitional role of historical study, and Option 1 emphasizes information rather than interpretive or theoretical outcomes.

DEC 10 DEC 10 Week 4 Practice Listening Test (with answers)

17. According to the lecturer, a study of the history of vernacular architecture would

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

What example does the lecturer give to illustrate the principle of ‘respect for local culture’?

16. In his introduction, the lecturer refers to

Choose A, B, or C, as the best answer. 3. The speaker seems to be pleased about:

17. According to the speaker, which of the following is true about traditional dances?

What does the speaker think about the future of car sharing?

Dialogue 1: Which activity?

Question at position 20 From the "Power of Hope" video, what task is important?Attend class every dayEnsure you have a degree Have a robust resumeMake your bed BlackTom题目解析

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler