3. According to Bruner, what is the recommended number of times (minimum)you must read the Case materials to gain an effective understanding?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question presented asks: 'According to Bruner, what is the recommended number of times (minimum) you must read the Case materials to gain an effective understanding?'

First, note that the provided data shows the correct answer as 'At least Twice', but there are no answer options listed in the answer_options field to compare against. This means we cannot evaluate multiple choices directly from the given options, and we must rely on the single stated answer as the reference point.

Understanding Bruner’s idea about case materials and reading multiple times: 
- Reading a case material once gives you an initial, surface-level grasp of the content, enabling you to identify core facts and the main narrative. 
- Reading a second time allows you to deepen comprehension, connect concepts, and begin to see relationships, implications, and underlying principles. 
- Bruner emphasized active engagement with text, formulation of questions, and reflection; reading at least twice aligns with moving from recall to analysis.

Why this suggested answer ('At least Twice') makes sense in context:
- A single read is often insufficient for effective understanding of case materials, which typically contain complex scenarios, multiple stakeholders, and nuanced problems. A second reading helps uncover details that were missed the first time and aids in building a more coherent interpretation.
- The 'at least' qualifier implies a minimum threshold, acknowledging that some cases may require even more rereading for full comprehension, synthesis, and application.

If other options were present, typical reasoning to evaluate them would include:
- An option claiming a single read is enough would be contradicted by Bruner’s emphasis on deeper processing and concept formation that usually requires reiteration.
- An option suggesting three or more reads could be reasonable in some intense cases, but would be less aligned with the standard minimum guidance implied by Bruner, which centers on multiple passes sufficient to move from basic understanding to deeper meaning.
- An option asserting that reading is unnecessary would be inconsistent with Bruner’s situated learning and the need to actively construct understanding through engagement with the material.

In summary, given the stated correct answer and Bruner’s general approach to case materials—where a second reading facilitates deeper comprehension and analysis—the recommendation of reading the materials at least twice reflects a sensible minimum for effective understanding.

ERMCPS5320_003_2025_1 - STRATEGIC RISK MANAGEMENT ERM Strategic Risk Management - PREREQUISITE QUIZ

3. According to Bruner, what is the recommended number of times (minimum)you must read the Case materials to gain an effective understanding?

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Which learning strategy requires students to overcome gaps in their knowledge by using other resources?

I use the organizational structure of the textbook to help me learn.

I try to translate new information into my own words.

I find myself using helpful learning strategies automatically.

Which of the following best describes children’s strategy-use as they learn reading and math?

The best way to learn something depends on what you are being asked to learn.

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler