The efficient legal system...

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

To begin, let’s restate the question and options. The question is: The efficient legal system... 
Options:
1) will implement the theoretically most efficient rules, regardless of cost
2) will minimize the sum of administrative costs and error costs, which often creates a tradeoff between theoretically better rules and simpler rules
3) will always rely on private bargaining to achieve efficiency

Now, evaluating each option:
Option 1: 'will implement the theoretically most efficient rules, regardless of cost.' This claims a purely idealized efficiency where the most efficient rules are adopted without regard to any costs. In real-world systems, even if some rules are theoretically efficient, there are administrative, political, and practical constraints; costs and feasibility matter. Therefore, this option overstates the role of theoretical efficiency and ignores the cost side, making it unlikely to describe an actual efficient legal system.

Option 2: 'will minimize the sum of administrative costs and error costs, which often creates a tradeoff between theoretically better rules and simpler rules.' This statement aligns with standard economic models of law and administrative efficiency. It acknowledges two key cost components: administrative costs (the expense of implementing and enforcing rules) and error costs (the costs of making wrong decisions due to imperfect rules). By aiming to minimize their sum, the system faces a tradeoff: rules that are theoretically optimal might be complex and costly to administer, while simpler rules are easier and cheaper to enforce but may be less precise. This reflects a realistic balance often discussed in literature on efficient legal design, recognizing constraints and tradeoffs rather than pursuing idealized efficiency alone.

Option 3: 'will always rely on private bargaining to achieve efficiency.' This overemphasizes private bargaining as the sole mechanism for efficiency. While bargaining can play a role in some contexts (e.g., private resolutions, contracts), an efficient legal system typically requires public rules, institutions, and enforcement beyond private bargains. It is inaccurate to claim this will always be the mechanism for efficiency, as public policy decisions, collective decision-making, and regulatory frameworks shape overall efficiency in many domains.

In summary, Option 1 misstates by ignoring costs and feasibility; Option 3 overclaims the exclusive reliance on private bargaining; Option 2 accurately captures the tradeoff between theoretical efficiency and practical costs by focusing on minimizing the combined administrative and error costs, which is a central concept in understanding efficient legal design.

SU25 ECON 522 001 ZFF Self Quiz, Week 4 part 3

The efficient legal system...

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

Under the assumptions used in cost-volume-profit analysis, as the activity increases:

The CVP and break-even analysis are supported by a range of important assumptions. Which of the following is not an assumption of the CVP:

The break-even point is that at which:

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler