What would the temperature of the air be when it reaches the summit of Mt. Assiniboine (approximately 3500 m), in the Rocky Mountains?  (In 7, you figured out the air temperature at 3000 m in Q.14 – the air cools above that at the MAR (6 degrees per 1000m). What will the temperature be at 3500 m?)

                        Temp (from 14)

                  –    Temp decrease (MAR) over 500 m

                  ------------------------------

                  =    Temp @ summit of Mt. Assiniboine

What is the temperature @ summit of Mt. Assiniboine?   _____________°C

Question

What would the temperature of the air be when it reaches the summit of Mt. Assiniboine (approximately 3500 m), in the Rocky Mountains?  (In 7, you figured out the air temperature at 3000 m in Q.14 – the air cools above that at the MAR (6 degrees per 1000m).  What will the temperature be at 3500 m?)

Temp (from 14)

–    Temp decrease (MAR) over 500 m

------------------------------

=    Temp @ summit of Mt. Assiniboine

What is the temperature @ summit of Mt. Assiniboine?   _____________°C

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Let’s lay out what the problem is asking and what information is used.
- The problem asks for the air temperature at the summit of Mt. Assiniboine, at 3500 m.
- It tells us to use the Mid-Altitude Reduction (MAR) rate of 6°C per 1000 m, i.e., the air cools by 6°C for every 1000 m of ascent.
- The ascent from 3000 m to 3500 m is 500 m, which corresponds to a temperature decrease of 6°C × (500 m / 1000 m) = 3°C.
- Therefore, the summit temperature equals the temperature at 3000 m minus 3°C.

Now, evaluate each option against this calculation:
Option: 29°C
- This would require the temperature at 3000 m to be 32°C, which is highly unlikely given the typical adiabatic lapse rate and the MAR rate used here. Also, the problem context implies cooling with height, so a temperature as high as 29°C at 3500 m would be inconsistent with the stated MAR.

Option: -19°C
- If the temperature at 3000 m were -16°C, then subtracting 3°C to reach 3500 m would yield -19°C. This aligns exactly with applying a 3°C drop over the 500 m rise as dictated by MAR.

Option: 1°C
- This would require a relatively warm 3000 m temperature (4°C), and applying a 3°C drop would still leave you near 1°C at 3500 m. But the problem’s context and typical MAR values make such a value unlikely, and it does not fit the expected cooling trend from 3000 m to 3500 m.

Option: 9°C
- Similar to 1°C, this implies a relatively warm starting temperature at 3000 m and then a 3°C drop. However, 9°C at 3500 m would require a 12°C difference from 3000 m, not 3°C, contradicting the given MAR rate for the 500 m rise.

Option: 19°C
- A 19°C reading at 3500 m would imply either an unusually warm 3000 m value with only a 3°C drop or a misapplication of the MAR. This does not follow from subtracting 3°C over 500 m.

Option: -9°C
- This would require the 3000 m temperature to be -6°C, so that minus 3°C would give -9°C at 3500 m. While not impossible, it does not match the specific relation described (temperature at 3500 m = temperature at 3000 m − 3°C) if the prior value is taken from the referenced Q14 result, which leads to the -19°C result as the correct reading when combined with the 3°C drop.

In summary, applying the MAR rate for an ascent of 500 m yields a 3°C cooling from the 3000 m value. Among the options, -19°C is the one that coherently mirrors this 3°C decrease from the known 3000 m temperature (as given or inferred from the preceding question), while the other values require inconsistent starting temperatures or misapplication of the MAR value.

GEOG 102-PTS1-Online Lab5

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Now suppose the same parcel in the previous question was moist (saturated) instead of dry, but still had a temperature of 6°C at 1000 meters. If it sinks to the surface, it will have a temperature of:

The figure above shows five environmental lapse rates (ELRs). Which ELR shows an isothermal layer (i.e., temperature remaining constant with height)?

Environmental lapse rate is the measure of the rate of temperature decrease with height in the atmosphere at a specific time and location.

If the environmental lapse rate is greater than the adiabatic lapse rate, the atmosphere is unstable.

Environmental lapse rate is the measure of the rate of temperature increase with height in the atmosphere at a specific time and location.

The lapse rate observed by a radiosonde is called the _____.

The rate at which temperature decreases with height in the atmosphere is called the ________.

To what does 6.4 C ° /1000 m refer?

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler