What is NOT a contribution linguistics makes to language revitalization?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question restatement: What is NOT a contribution linguistics makes to language revitalization?

Option 1: 'Analysis of the vocabulary and grammar to establish documentation of the language so it can be taught' — This is a genuine linguistic contribution. Linguists document lexical items, grammatical structures, and usage to create resources for teaching and preservation, which supports revitalization efforts.

Option 2: 'Expertise in language teaching methods' — While not always the central focus of linguistic documentation, linguists often contribute by informing or developing effective teaching approaches, thereby aiding revitalization through pedagogy and curriculum design. This is a valid contribution.

Option 3: 'Assistance with record keeping (videos, audio, etc.) to preserve knowledge of the language' — Recording and archiving language data is a core function in language documentation and revitalization, ensuring materials survive for future learners and researchers. This is a legitimate linguistic contribution.

Option 4: 'Improvement on the syntax and vocabulary of the language so it will be more logical and streamlined than the original variety' — This statement describes altering the language to be more logical or streamlined than its original form. Linguistics typically documents and analyzes existing forms rather than reshaping them to fit a standard or idealized version. Prescriptive modernization or redesign of a language is not generally a contribution of linguistics to revitalization; it risks erasing authentic variation and historical usage. This option stands out as not aligning with standard linguistic contributions to revitalization.

In sum, options 1, 2, and 3 describe typical linguistic contributions to language revitalization through documentation, pedagogy, and archival work, while option 4 describes a prescriptive improvement that is not a typical or appropriate linguistic contribution in this context.

ling_222_120251_246103 Week 10 Reading Quiz

What is NOT a contribution linguistics makes to language revitalization?

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

Under the assumptions used in cost-volume-profit analysis, as the activity increases:

The CVP and break-even analysis are supported by a range of important assumptions. Which of the following is not an assumption of the CVP:

The break-even point is that at which:

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler