The linguistic relativity hypothesis states that:

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The task presents the question: 'The linguistic relativity hypothesis states that:' and indicates that the available answer is 'language influences thought.' However, no answer options are provided for evaluation.

First, acknowledge the missing options: without the full set of choices, we cannot systematically compare and contrast each potential statement to determine which one aligns with the intended correct option. The analysis below therefore focuses on the core concept of linguistic relativity and typical ways it is tested in multiple-choice formats.

Understanding the concept: Linguistic relativity (often associated with the Sapir–Whorf hypothesis) contends that language can influence, and in some formulations shape, the way people think and perceive the world. This idea is generally framed as a gradient rather than an absolute rule, with two commonly discussed versions:
- The weaker form posits that language influences certain cognitive processes, categorization, and perception, thereby biasing thought in systematic ways.
- The stronger form suggests that language determines thought to a large extent, constraining cognitive processes and the range of possible thoughts.

If an option in a typical set were to state that 'language influences thought,' this would correspond to the weaker, more widely supported interpretation. It acknowledges a relationship between language and cognition without claiming that language wholly determines all thought.

Potential incorrect directions that might appear as distractors in options:
- A statement claiming that 'language determines thought' would reflect the stronger Sapir–Whorf position. While influential historically, this is controversial and considered too strong by many contemporary researchers.
- A statement suggesting 'thought determines language' would invert the hypothesized relationship and misrepresent the core idea of linguistic relativity.
- An option claiming 'there is no relationship between language and thought' would directly contradict the core claim of linguistic relativity and would typically be incorrect in contexts discussing this hypothesis.
- An option that limits the effect to only cultural or social factors, ignoring linguistic structure, would mischaracterize the theory by underemphasizing how language itself can shape perception and categorization.

In summary, with the given phrasing and the common formulation of linguistic relativity, the statement 'language influences thought' aligns with the widely discussed weaker interpretation of the hypothesis. Nevertheless, due to the absence of explicit answer choices, this analysis remains contingent on what options were intended to accompany the question.

Introduction to Psychology Midterm (1-7) - PSYC 1A - Closes 4/17

The linguistic relativity hypothesis states that:

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Language and thought are the same thing.

The linguistic relativity hypothesis states that:

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

Under the assumptions used in cost-volume-profit analysis, as the activity increases:

More Practical Tools for International Students

Homework AI Solver

Stylized Writing Assistant

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation Assistant

In-Class Translation Assistant

Class Notes Assistant

Quiz Search Assistant

Past Exam Questions by School

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler