Which of the following is NOT a reason why the land around Auckland is so valuable for agriculture?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The provided data for this question is incomplete: the list of answer options is missing, so we cannot analyze each alternative as requested. What we do have is the stated correct option from the 'answer' field: 'c. No competing uses of land.'

However, the assertion in option c is typically incorrect as a general statement about land value for agriculture. In most agricultural regions, land around a major city like Auckland is valuable precisely because there are competing uses and pressures on land: urban growth, housing development, infrastructure, conservation, and other agricultural or commercial activities compete for the same parcels of land. This competition tends to drive up land values and shapes land-use patterns, often making agricultural land particularly valuable when it sits in a desirable location with good access to markets, ports, and services.

To understand why 'no competing uses of land' is not a valid reason, consider these points:
- In most areas near cities, land faces multiple demand channels (housing, industry, transport corridors, recreation, and farming), which makes the claim of a lack of competing uses highly unlikely.
- The opportunity cost of keeping land for agriculture is often high when there is potential for urban or industrial development nearby, which itself can make agricultural land valuable but for different reasons (proximity to markets, infrastructure, and climate suitability).
- Land value tends to reflect not just suitability for agriculture but also access to inputs (water, fertilizers, labor) and outputs (markets, processing facilities, exports via ports). Competing uses can increase overall land value by enhancing accessibility and economic integration, even if they constrain some agricultural uses.

Since no alternative options are present to compare against, we cannot evaluate how each other choice would be incorrect. In a complete set of options, we would assess each statement for accuracy by linking it to agricultural land values driven by climate, soil quality, water availability, topography, market access, and regulatory/policy context, and determine which one does not fit the common explanations for land value around Auckland.

Which of the following is NOT a reason why the land around Auckland is so valuable for agriculture?

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Which of the following are uses for lawns in the USA?

Use your knowledge of land use and agricultural inputs to match the letters on the graph with the food product that they represent. 1: A 2: B 3: C 4: D

Agricultural cropland production (pasture lands excluded) is practiced on approximately what percentage of the global land surface?

Which of the following is NOT a reason why the land around Auckland is so valuable for agriculture?

Briefly describe the landscape in this spot. Type: 36 33 24.65N, 140 32 10.97E

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler