Based on what you've learned from this weeks reading and viewing (and earlier lectures), why do you think there is more grazing land for cattle in the western Dakotas and Great Plains region compared to southern Minnesota which is dominated by corn and soybean crops? (hint: it can be for reasons of natural climate or human management)

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question asks us to compare grazing land availability in the western Dakotas and Great Plains with southern Minnesota, considering natural climate or human management factors.
Option 1: 'Western North and South Dakota receive less rainfall (< 15 inches per year)'. This reasoning points to the climate factor: the western Dakotas and much of the Great Plains experience semi-arid to arid conditions with relatively low annual precipitation. Such a climate supports grasses suitable for grazing and tends to be less conducive to rain-fed, high-yield row crops like corn and soybeans. In many places, irrigation would be required for those crops, increasing costs and reducing suitability for farmers who manage large cattle herds on rangeland. From a land-use perspective, lower rainfall and drier conditions favor extensive grazing systems over intensive row-crop agriculture, aligning with why there is more grazing land there compared with southern Minnesota.

However, to fully assess the statement, we should consider other factors as well. For instance, human management and policy choices have steered land use toward grazing in parts of the Plains due to higher suitability for grasses and cattle production, land tenure patterns, and the historical development of ranching in the region. Conversely, southern Minnesota has deeper soils, a longer growing season, and sufficient rainfall that supports corn and soybean monoculture and mechanized farming, which can reduce the extent of permanent grazing lands.

A complete evaluation would also weigh soil types, landform (e.g., plains vs. hillier terrain), nutrient management, crop prices and subsidies, water access, and infrastructure for feed and cattle. Without other options to compare, we can still see that the given climatic constraint (low rainfall) is a plausible driver for greater grazing land in the western Plains relative to southern Minnesota, where more agronomic cropping is feasible and common.

If there were additional options, we would evaluate them by noting whether they cite similar climate limitations, soil characteristics, crop economics, or land-management decisions, and we would contrast each with the rainfall-driven argument presented here to determine which explanations align best with observed land use.

SSM 3301 (001) 6) Week 6 Quiz - Water in Agriculture & Food

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Which of the following are uses for lawns in the USA?

Use your knowledge of land use and agricultural inputs to match the letters on the graph with the food product that they represent. 1: A 2: B 3: C 4: D

Agricultural cropland production (pasture lands excluded) is practiced on approximately what percentage of the global land surface?

Which of the following is NOT a reason why the land around Auckland is so valuable for agriculture?

Which of the following is NOT a reason why the land around Auckland is so valuable for agriculture?

Briefly describe the landscape in this spot. Type: 36 33 24.65N, 140 32 10.97E

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler