Which of the following is an observed unintended consequence of the Family Tax Benefits in some countries mentioned in the lecture?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question restatement: Which of the following is an observed unintended consequence of the Family Tax Benefits in some countries mentioned in the lecture?

Option A: An economic growth that is greater than expected. While family tax benefits can influence household spending and economic activity, attributing a universally observed growth that exceeds expectations oversimplifies outcomes and would typically require strong empirical evidence across contexts. The lecture likely highlighted more targeted or nuanced effects rather than a broad, unexpectedly large GDP boost.

Option B: Improved academic achievement of the children of families receiving the benefits. Although financial support can indirectly affect resources available for education, improved academic achievement is not consistently observed as a direct or unintended consequence in many discussions of family benefits. The literature often notes mixed or modest educational effects, with many other mediating factors involved.

Option C: Increased labour market participation among single parents and formerly workless families. This aligns with a common unintended consequence noted in policy discussions: when families receive financial support or tax benefits, there can be an incentive or opportunity to enter or re-enter the workforce, particularly for single parents or those who were not previously working. The benefit structure may reduce barriers to work or make work more financially rewarding, leading to higher participation rates than before. This kind of labor-supply response is frequently observed or anticipated in policy analyses, though it can vary by country and design of the benefits.

Why each option is incorrect or less fitting:
- Option A asserts a universal, greater-than-expected economic growth, which is a broad macro outcome that is not typically described as an unintended consequence of targeted family benefits in lecture material. It ignores the more nuanced, distributional, and labor-market effects usually emphasized.
- Option B posits improved academic achievement as an unintended consequence. While financial support can affect resources conducive to learning, education outcomes are influenced by many variables (quality of schooling, environment, parental engagement). The claim of a direct, unintended educational improvement is not a standard or consistently observed consequence highlighted in discussions of these policies.
- Option C describes a labor-market effect that policy analyses often report as an unintended consequence: greater participation among groups that were underutilizing work opportunities, such as single parents and those previously not in the labor force. This reflects how tax benefits can alter the cost-benefit calculus of work, making employment more attractive or feasible for these groups.

In summary, among the listed possibilities, the observation most commonly framed as an unintended labor-market response is the increase in participation among single parents and formerly workless families, whereas the other options either overstate macro growth or assume education outcomes improve directly due to the benefits.

ME Mod4 Intake 2A - 14 Apr 2025 - 4 Jul 2025 Activity 8.2A - Modern Family and Economics Comprehension Questions

Which of the following is an observed unintended consequence of the Family Tax Benefits in some countries mentioned in the lecture?

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

For the case above, how will the reduction in immigration affect the real wage?

In the two-period model with investment, we are confident that the labor supply curve is upward sloping at any wage level because we are making which of the following assumptions:

Consider the labor-leisure choice model. Which of the following is a correct statement about the Marshallian demands:

In the two-period model with investment, we are confident that the labor supply curve is upward sloping at any wage level because we are making which of the following assumptions:

Consider the labor-leisure choice model. Which of the following is a correct statement about the Marshallian demands:

Other things being equal, a _____ supply of workers tends to _ real wages.

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler

ME Mod4 Intake 2A - 14 Apr 2025 - 4 Jul 2025 Activity 8.2A - Modern Family and Economics Comprehension Questions

Which of the following is an observed unintended consequence of the Family Tax Benefits in some countries mentioned in the lecture?

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

For the case above, how will the reduction in immigration affect the real wage?

In the two-period model with investment, we are confident that the labor supply curve is upward sloping at any wage level because we are making which of the following assumptions:

Consider the labor-leisure choice model. Which of the following is a correct statement about the Marshallian demands:

In the two-period model with investment, we are confident that the labor supply curve is upward sloping at any wage level because we are making which of the following assumptions:

Consider the labor-leisure choice model. Which of the following is a correct statement about the Marshallian demands:

Other things being equal, a _____________ supply of workers tends to _________ real wages.

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Making Your Study Simpler

Other things being equal, a _____ supply of workers tends to _ real wages.