On April 30, 2025, the BEA released the first estimate of GDP in the first quarter of 2025. According to the official report, in the first quarter of 2025, there was a downturn in government spending. Suppose this government behavior continues in an effort of President Trump to reduce the national debt.

In the context of the two-period model with investment, how does a reduction in government spending affect the labor market?

Question

On April 30, 2025, the BEA released the first estimate of GDP in the first quarter of 2025. According to the official report, in the first quarter of 2025, there was a downturn in government spending. Suppose this government behavior continues in an effort of President Trump to reduce the national debt.

In the context of the two-period model with investment, how does a reduction in government spending affect the labor market?

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

To begin, let's lay out what the question is asking in this two-period model with investment: a reduction in government spending tends to depress overall demand, which affects output, investment, and the labor market over time.
Option 1: 'Less workers will be employed, and they will receive higher wages.' This is unlikely in a downturn scenario. A contraction in government spending reduces aggregate demand, which typically lowers employment, and wage pressures are not expected to rise when the economy is weaker; thus this option misstates both the employment and the wage implications.
Option 2: 'Less workers will be employed, and they will receive lower wages.' This aligns with standard results from a fall in aggregate demand: fewer job opportunities and downward pressure on wages due to weaker bargaining power and excess labor supply relative to demand. In a two-period model with investment, reduced government spending can dampen investment and output, leading to higher unemployment and softer wages in the short to medium run.
Option 3: 'More workers will be employed, and they will receive lower wages.' The idea of more employment in conjunction with lower wages usually requires an expansionary or stimulus scenario (higher demand or efficiency gains). Here, government spending is falling, not rising, so increased hiring is inconsistent with the described shock.
Option 4: 'More workers will be employed, and they will receive higher wages.' Higher employment with higher wages suggests an overheating economy or a positive supply shock, neither of which is implied by a government spending contraction in this setup. It contradicts the expected negative demand effect on both employment and wages.
In summary, a decline in government spending reduces aggregate demand and investment in the two-period framework, which typically lowers both employment and wages due to weaker demand for labor and reduced firms’ ability to pay higher wages. Therefore, the most consistent choice among the options is the one stating fewer workers and lower wages.

ECON 13210 94 Introduction to Macroeconomic Models Final Exam

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Compared to 100 years ago, there is a higher demand for skilled workers in the United States.

Question at position 1 Labor shortage occurs when the Question Blank 1 of 2[input] of labor is less than the Question Blank 2 of 2[input] for labor?

Labor market is a bourse market.

By researching Labor Market Information you will learn about:

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler