A joint venture is often politically more acceptable than a wholly owned subsidiary and brings a degree of local knowledge to the subsidiary.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The statement under consideration is about joint ventures versus wholly owned subsidiaries, focusing on political acceptability and local knowledge.
Option 1: True. The claim that a joint venture is often more politically acceptable than a wholly owned subsidiary can be accurate in many contexts. Joint ventures involve local partners and shared control, which can reduce political friction, address local stakeholder concerns, and leverage local knowledge. This arrangement can also help with regulatory approvals and community relations by signaling collaboration with local entities.
Option 2: False. This would assert that a joint venture is not more politically acceptable or that it brings no local knowledge advantages. In practice, wholly owned subsidiaries may face higher political scrutiny and suspicion from host governments or communities due to perceived lack of local engagement, and they typically do not inherently provide local knowledge unless a local partner is involved. Therefore, the blanket claim that joint ventures are not more politically acceptable or that they do not bring local knowledge is not generally accurate.
Option 3: (If present) Not applicable here, as only two choices are provided. However, in analysis, it’s important to note that the nuance lies in political context, regulatory environment, and the specifics of the venture, which can affect acceptability and local knowledge contribution.
Option 4: (If present) Not applicable here, but again, the key factors involve stakeholder perception, regulatory incentives, and alignment with local interests, which can favor joint ventures in many markets.
In summary, the emphasis on political acceptability and local knowledge is commonly associated with joint ventures, making the true statement that the claim is true based on typical business and political dynamics.

A joint venture is often politically more acceptable than a wholly owned subsidiary and brings a degree of local knowledge to the subsidiary.

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Question at position 16 When entering a Joint Venture with a capital partner, you want to make sure your business plans and vision align.TrueFalse

At the beginning of a joint venture (labeled the “shakeout phase”), both firms face a crisis of identity during which they need to figure out for whom they work and how to deal with uncertainty.

The most typical joint venture is a ________ venture.

If a firm’s core competence is proprietary technological knowledge, a joint venture is preferable.

4. What is the definition of a "joint venture" in terms of theatrical producing?

Which one of the following is a key advantage of a joint venture?

One advantage of joint ventures is that

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler