Questions
Questions
Single choice

Which of the following theories is most likely not relevant for explaining the underpricing phenomenon in IPOs?

Options
A.A. Tax shield effect: Since companies reduce their leverage because of the IPO, the reduction in tax shields leads to a decrease in firm value.
B.B. Strategic ownership: Since incumbent shareholders and managers prefer to reduce the block size of new shareholders, some investors are sorted out in the bookbuilding process. Hence, demand is artificially reduced leading to a downward pressure on the issue price.
C.C. Signaling: IPOs are like Akerlof’s lemons, so underpricing is used as a signal for the true firm value.
D.D. Institutional allotment: In order to attract institutional investors to the bookbuilding process, an indirect reward in form of the underpricing is granted.
View Explanation

View Explanation

Verified Answer
Please login to view
Step-by-Step Analysis
To approach this question, I will evaluate each proposed theory in the context of IPO underpricing and assess whether it provides a plausible explanation. Option A: 'Tax shield effect: Since companies reduce their leverage because of the IPO, the reduction in tax shields leads to a decrease in firm value.' This argument centers on tax-shield changes due to changes in leverage. While capital structure effects are important for firm value in general, underpricing in IPOs is typically explained by factors tied to information asymmetry and the primary market mechanics (who knows the ......Login to view full explanation

Log in for full answers

We've collected over 50,000 authentic exam questions and detailed explanations from around the globe. Log in now and get instant access to the answers!

Similar Questions

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Join us and instantly unlock extensive past papers & exclusive solutions to get a head start on your studies!