(29) Nation-states and civil institutions need to:

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question restatement: The prompt asks what nation-states and civil institutions need to do in light of global changes.
Option a: 'play a much more significant role in the world.' While states do engage internationally, the statement over-promises a blanket increase in significance for all contexts and may ignore the evolving nature of governance where regional actors and non-state actors also gain influence. This option is not a precise fit with the idea of adapting to a changing environment.
Option b: 'develop more effective socio-economic policies.' This is generally a prudent aim for any government or civil institution, but the phrase doesn’t directly address the core dynamic being referenced—namely, adapting to rapid, structural shifts in the international landscape. It’s plausible but not the strongest match to the stated need to respond to change itself.
Option c: 'adjust to the changing international environment.' This statement directly captures the essential response described by the prompt: flexibility and adaptation to evolving global conditions, including geopolitical, economic, technological, and normative changes. It emphasizes responsiveness rather than static behavior, aligning with concepts of strategic alignment and resilience in international relations and governance.
Option d: 'accept that they are not relevant in today's world.' This is contrary to the idea of adaptation and effectiveness; it asserts irrelevance, which is typically unfounded given ongoing state and civil-society roles. It represents a dismissive and pessimistic view that does not reflect the need to engage with an interconnected world.
Additional nuance: The phrase 'changing international environment' implies unpredictability, interconnected challenges, and shifting power dynamics. Therefore, the most accurate and comprehensive option is the one that highlights adjusting in response to those changing conditions, rather than asserting a blanket increase in power, a narrow policy focus, or irrelevance.
In summary, while options a and b describe proactive or strategic aims, they do not directly address the core imperative of adaptability to global shifts as cleanly as option c. Option d contradicts the assumed premise of continued relevance and effectiveness in international affairs. The reasoning thus endorses option c as the appropriate choice by aligning with the overarching need for responsiveness to evolving international conditions.

(29) Nation-states and civil institutions need to:

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Theory of international relations claiming international relations are driven by state self-interest and power relations is called...

The term "soft power" refers to...

Burger et al argue that because all nations play by the same rules, it will be easy to negotiate global resource regimes once the regimes are created.

Markets usually operate well, but government intervention and strong international institutions can help individual governments overcome market failures.