What was the main finding in Perez et al. (2024) and their study on Black solidarity with other people of color?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question restatement: What was the main finding in Perez et al. (2024) and their study on Black solidarity with other people of color?

Option 1: 'Shared discrimination between Latinos and Blacks led to support for pro-racial minority policies, which was mediated by solidarity with people of color.' This aligns with a central claim that experiencing shared discrimination can foster solidarity across racial groups, which in turn translates into greater backing for policies benefiting racial minorities. The mediation via solidarity with people of color explains the mechanism by which discrimination experiences translate into policy support. This option presents a coherent sequence: discrimination exposure → increased cross-group solidarity → augmented support for pro-minority policies.

Option 2: 'Shared discrimination between Latinos and Blacks led to a decrease in support for pro-racial minority policies.' This reverses the expected directional effect. The literature on intergroup contact and perceived threat often shows that shared experiences can enhance intergroup cooperation and policy support, not reduce it. Unless there is a stated countervailing mechanism, this option is inconsistent with the described mediating role of solidarity and the positive policy-support outcome.

Option 3: 'Shared discrimination between Latinos and Blacks led to support for pro-racial minority policies, which was NOT significantly mediated by any other variable.' If the study highlighted solidarity with people of color as a mediator, then asserting there was no significant mediation contradicts the reported mechanism. This would imply a direct effect only, which would be at odds with a mediation model highlighting a mediator variable.

Option 4: 'Shared discrimination between Latinos and Blacks led to support for pro-racial minority policies, which was mediated by empathic concerns of outgroup members.' While empathic concern could plausibly be a mediator in some studies, the specified main finding emphasizes solidarity with people of color as the mediator. Unless the study explicitly tested empathic concerns and found mediation there, this option adds a mediator that is not indicated as the primary pathway in the reported result.

Synthesis across options: The most faithful reconstruction of the reported main finding is the positive link between shared discrimination and policy support, operating through a mediator capturing cross-group solidarity. The other options either invert the effect, deny mediation, or propose a different mediator not identified as the primary mechanism in the study.

Contextual note: When interpreting mediation in intergroup research, identifying a plausible and tested mediator is crucial. Here, solidarity with people of color functions as the bridge between shared discrimination experiences and policy support, distinguishing it from a direct effect or alternative mediators that were not supported by the reported findings.

25S-POL SCI-M141A-LEC-1 / 25S-PSYCH-M138-LEC-1 Quiz 4

What was the main finding in Perez et al. (2024) and their study on Black solidarity with other people of color?

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

According to Pérez, Vicuña, and Ramos (2023), when is solidarity between Black Americans and other people of color most likely to emerge?

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

Under the assumptions used in cost-volume-profit analysis, as the activity increases:

The CVP and break-even analysis are supported by a range of important assumptions. Which of the following is not an assumption of the CVP:

More Practical Tools for International Students

Homework AI Solver

Stylized Writing Assistant

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation Assistant

In-Class Translation Assistant

Class Notes Assistant

Quiz Search Assistant

Past Exam Questions by School

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler