Billy is a woodworker who makes and sells furniture made out of cedar wood. Sally is a fisher and sells her catch of the day to the local market. Both Billy and Sally are in search of a plot of land that provides natural resources to continue their businesses. They both find the same plot of land for sale that has cedar trees and running water abundantly filled with fish.

What negotiation strategy should Billy and Sally use to both create the most value for themselves?

Question

Billy is a woodworker who makes and sells furniture made out of cedar wood. Sally is a fisher and sells her catch of the day to the local market. Both Billy and Sally are in search of a plot of land that provides natural resources to continue their businesses. They both find the same plot of land for sale that has cedar trees and running water abundantly filled with fish.

What negotiation strategy should Billy and Sally use to both create the most value for themselves?

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The scenario involves Billy and Sally both needing natural resources from the same plot of land, with cedar trees and abundant fish. They could potentially create more value together by collaborating rather than sharing a single winner, so we evaluate each option.
Option A: A ZOPA strategy. This term refers to the Zone of Possible Agreement, which is a concept used to identify a range where both parties’ interests overlap. While recognizing a ZOPA is important for negotiation, it isn’t itself a strategy for how to negotiate to maximize joint value, but rather a diagnostic tool used within various strategies. Therefore, this option describes a concept rather than a full strategy for creating value.
Option B: An anchoring position. Anchoring involves establishing a starting point to influence the bargaining range. While anchoring can shape subsequent negotiation dynamics, it typically supports distributive bargaining where parties aim to claim value rather than expand it. In a context where both parties share access to complementary resources, anchoring alone risks constraining joint gains rather than maximizing them.
Option C: A distributive strategy. Distributive bargaining is about dividing a fixed pie, often resulting in one party gaining at the expense of the other. Since the land contains resources that both parties can use in ways that may complement each other, a purely distributive approach would likely limit overall value and fail to capture synergies from cooperation.
Option D: An aspirational strategy. An aspirational approach focuses on ambitious goals and may drive both sides toward high outcomes, but by itself it does not specify how to structure interactions to realize those goals, nor does it guarantee joint value creation. It’s more about goals than the method for achieving them, so it’s incomplete as a standalone strategy for this scenario.
Option E: An integrative strategy. Integrative (or collaborative) negotiation aims to expand the pie by identifying shared interests and creating value through cooperation, such as combining resources or agreeing on usage that benefits both parties. In this case, Billy and Sally can leverage their respective access to cedar and fish to design a mutually beneficial arrangement, like joint stewardship, shared harvesting schedules, or complementary use plans that increase total value and sustainability for both businesses. This approach aligns with the goal of creating the most value for both sides, making it the best fit among the options.
In summary, the integrative strategy stands out because it emphasizes collaboration to expand overall value rather than merely claiming a larger share of a fixed resource pool, and it is well-suited to a situation where both parties hold different, but complementary, resource interests.

BUSMHR 2292 SP2025 (4710) Exam #1

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Which of the following is a characteristic of integrative bargaining?

What is the term for a bargaining approach in which the negotiators try to move from a positions-based approach to an interests-based approach?

Which negotiation process uses an interests-based approach and aims for mutually beneficial outcomes?

Which of the following is a characteristic of integrative bargaining?

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler