Consider the following code:

long y = 9223372036854775807L;
y = y + 1;
System.out.println(y);

What number does the program print when compiled and run? Hint: think about the max value you just looked up in your previous answer.

Question

Consider the following code:

long y = 9223372036854775807L;
y = y + 1;
System.out.println(y);

What number does the program print when compiled and run? Hint: think about the max value you just looked up in your previous answer.

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

First, recall the behavior of 64-bit signed integers in Java. A long is a 64-bit two's complement integer, with a range from -2^63 to 2^63 - 1, i.e., from -9223372036854775808 to 9223372036854775807. This means that when you add 1 to the maximum value, the value wraps around to the minimum value due to overflow.

Option 1: -9223372036854775808. This matches the expected result of overflowing Long.MAX_VALUE by 1, yielding Long.MIN_VALUE. So this option aligns with how Java handles overflow for long arithmetic.

Option 2: -1. This would imply an overflow from a small negative to another negative, or some other erroneous state, but it does not reflect the standard 64-bit overflow wraparound from the exact maximum value. This choice misinterprets the wrap behavior.

Option 3: 0. Getting 0 would require a different operation (for example, adding 1 to  -1 with a specific sequence that causes modulo behavior in a loop), but directly adding 1 to Long.MAX_VALUE cannot produce 0 in a single overflow step.

Option 4: This program crashes and raises a longOverflow exception. In Java, integer overflow is defined by wraparound semantics for primitive integral types; there is no exception thrown for overflow. Therefore, a runtime crash or a specific longOverflow exception does not occur here.

Option 5: 9223372036854775808. This value is one greater than Long.MAX_VALUE and cannot be represented in a long. Instead, the overflow wraps to Long.MIN_VALUE, not this out-of-range value.

In summary, understanding the fixed bounds of long and the wraparound behavior on overflow explains why the value after y = y + 1; is Long.MIN_VALUE, which corresponds to -9223372036854775808.

(862646) AP CS A Unit 1: Lesson 3 - Review Questions

Consider the following code: long y = 9223372036854775807L; y = y + 1; System.out.println(y); What number does the program print when compiled and run? Hint: think about the max value you just looked up in your previous answer.

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Which of the following is a potential issue when computing mid = (low + high) // 2 for very large lists?

When might you encounter a problem with integer overflow? 什么时候可能会遇到整数溢出问题？

An overflow error takes place when:

(Continuing the add Ada function from the previous question.) If we compile and run an Ada version of this function, on a platform with 32-bit Integers, passing it the values of a = 2147483647 and b = 10, the program results in a CONSTRAINT_ERROR being raised. Why does this error occur:

What can happen when a calculated value is too large to be represented by the available number of bits in a fixed-size data type?

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler