This question refers to the data "binoculars_midterm.csv".

What is the partial F-statistic (for the first stage regression/ weak instrument test) if you carry out instrumental variable estimation that relies on the strongest, valid instrument(s) possible for your data?

Question

This question refers to the data "binoculars_midterm.csv".

What is the partial F-statistic (for the first stage regression/ weak instrument test) if you carry out instrumental variable estimation that relies on the strongest, valid instrument(s) possible for your data?

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question asks about the partial F-statistic in the first-stage regression when performing instrumental variable estimation using the strongest, valid instrument(s) available in the data set.

First, recall what the partial F-statistic represents: in IV/2SLS, the strength of the instrument is judged by how well the instrument(s) explain variation in the endogenous regressor after controlling for any included exogenous variables. A higher partial F-stat suggests a stronger instrument, reducing concerns about weak instruments.

Because this is a numerical problem tied to a specific dataset (binoculars_midterm.csv), the partial F-statistic must come from estimating the first-stage regression in that data. Without actually running the regression and seeing the output, we cannot derive the exact number from theory alone. The problem statement, however, provides a claimed answer: 2,500.

Option by option, here are considerations you would assess if you had the data:
- If the strongest, valid instrument(s) explain a large portion of the variation in the endogenous regressor, the partial F-statistic would be large. A value in the hundreds or thousands would indicate an extremely strong instrument under typical sampling assumptions.
- If the instrument is weak or poorly specified, the partial F-statistic would be closer to or below the conventional rule-of-thumb threshold (e.g., around 10 or 20, depending on context), signaling potential Weak Instrument concerns.
- Very large values (like 2,500) are unusual but possible in large samples or when the instrument is extremely predictive, or if the model includes many instruments with little overidentification adjustment; nonetheless, such a value would typically be interpreted as a very strong instrument in the first stage.
- The interpretation of the partial F-statistic also hinges on the exact specification: what controls are included in the first-stage, whether multiple instruments are used, and whether the relevant test is for a single endogenous regressor or multiple endogenous variables.

Since no explicit options are presented to compare, here is how you would approach verification if you had access to the data and software output: run the first-stage regression of the endogenous variable on the instrument(s) and all exogenous controls, then read off the partial F-statistic for the instrument(s) of interest. Compare it to conventional benchmarks (e.g., 10 as a general rule of thumb; some texts use 20 or higher in more demanding contexts). If the output indeed shows a very large value like 2,500, you would conclude that the instruments are very strong in that sample.

Common pitfalls to avoid when interpreting the partial F-statistic include mistaking the overall F-statistic for the partial F-statistic when additional regressors or multiple endogenous variables are present, or misreading the output if the software labels the statistic differently (e.g., as an partial R-squared test or an abundance of weak-instrument diagnostics).

In sum, the partial F-statistic evaluates instrument strength in the first-stage, with larger values indicating stronger instruments. If the provided answer is 2,500, this would be interpreted as an exceptionally strong instrument, assuming the value is derived from the correct first-stage specification and sample context.

BUSA90544_2025_OCT Marketing Analytics Mid-term Exam 2025

This question refers to the data "binoculars_midterm.csv". What is the partial F-statistic (for the first stage regression/ weak instrument test) if you carry out instrumental variable estimation that relies on the strongest, valid instrument(s) possible for your data?

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Question6 For IV estimation, which condition ensures instrument relevance? Select one alternative: a) [math] b) [math] c) [math] d) [math] ResetMaximum marks: 0.5 Flag question undefined

Under what condition can the Sargan or Basmann test for overidentifying restrictions be performed in an IV/2SLS context?

What is the primary problem associated with using "weak instruments" (instruments that have low correlation with the endogenous variable) in IV/2SLS estimation?

In the Two-Stage Least Squares (2SLS) estimation procedure, what is the purpose of the first stage regression?

What does the "relevance" condition for a valid instrumental variable 𝑧 (used for an endogenous variable 𝑥 ) require?

What is the primary problem associated with using "weak instruments" (instruments that have low correlation with the endogenous variable) in IV/2SLS estimation?

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler