Required information
Skip to question

Watch the concept clip and then answer the questions.

Click here for a transcript of the video.

You have observed that you support political candidate A. All of your friends support political candidate A. If you use inductive reasoning, which of these conclusions are you likely to reach?

Question

Required information
Skip to question

Watch the concept clip and then answer the questions.

Click here for a transcript of the video.

You have observed that you support political candidate A. All of your friends support political candidate A. If you use inductive reasoning, which of these conclusions are you likely to reach?

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

When evaluating this scenario through inductive reasoning, we start from a specific observation and generalize to a broader claim.
Option 1: 'Most people don’t pay attention to politics.' This generalization goes beyond the observed sample (your observation and your friends) and introduces an assumption about a large population. Inductive reasoning would require more diverse data points before making a broad claim about political engagement.
Option 2: 'No other individuals support political candidate A.' This is an extreme, universal negative that contradicts your own observation (you and your friends support A). Inductive reasoning would avoid such absolute conclusions unless there is overwhelming evidence, and a single or small sample cannot justify that universal negation.
Option 3: 'People will have varying levels of support for political candidate A.' This option reflects a nuanced, probabilistic expectation consistent with induction. From observing a subset that supports A, a reasonable extrapolation is that support in the broader population will vary, rather than being uniform. Inductive reasoning acknowledges diversity and distribution of opinions rather than assuming everyone is the same.
Option 4: 'All individuals support political candidate A.' This is another universal claim that overgeneralizes from a limited sample. Inductive reasoning would be cautious about such sweeping statements because it ignores potential variability and dissent in the wider population.
In summary, inductive reasoning moves from specific observations to generalizations that are probabilistic and open to variation. The options that claim uniform or universal support step beyond what the observed data support and are therefore less justified, whereas recognizing variability aligns with the core idea of induction.

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Question at position 21 Human beings will often reason from the specific to the general. That is, people often will form general rules and concepts based on specific experiences and examples. This type of reasoning is termedmetacognitionproblem spacinginductive reasoningdeductive reasoningsubgoaling

Question at position 3 A dog bit Sam when he was a small child, and now Sam believes all dogs bite. Which of the following is a type of reasoning that Sam is using to come to this conclusion?InductiveDeductiveIconicEchoic

Question at position 34 II and IIII onlyI and IIII and IIIII and IV

Real-world observations lead to new ideas in which type of reasoning?

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler