Question at position 34 II and IIII onlyI and IIII and IIIII and IV

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question presents a seemingly garbled prompt, but the essential task is to evaluate which pair or combination of statements about inductive reasoning is the exception. We are given five answer choices and provided that the correct answer is III and IV.

Option II and III: This pair asserts that the statements in II and III form the exception. If II is true (closely related to empiricism) but III is false (top-down reasoning is not inductive), then the combination II and III would not consistently represent the set of exceptions. Mixing a true claim with a false claim in a single “exception” grouping is not a coherent identification of all and only the exceptions. In other words, because III is not an inductive trait, using II together with III as the exception is not a clean, exclusive set of incorrect statements.

Option I only: This option claims that only statement I is the exception. However, given that inductive reasoning typically includes: (I) reasoning that yields probable conclusions, and (II) being closely related to empiricism, while (III) and (IV) are generally not inductive (top-down reasoning and certainty-focused methods, i.e., deductive approaches), selecting only I as the exception would mischaracterize the landscape available in the list. Specifically, I is usually a true descriptor of inductive reasoning, so designating it as the sole exception contradicts the standard view and the provided solution.

Option I and III: This pairing selects I (generally true for inductive reasoning) together with III (top-down reasoning, which is not inductive). Since III is itself not an inductive trait, including it in the exception set is plausible. However, because I is not an exception, combining I with III would again fail to isolate exactly the non-inductive elements without including a correct inductive property. The inconsistency makes this option an unlikely correct grouping for the exception set.

Option I and II: If I is typically true for inductive reasoning and II is closely related to empiricism (also typically true), then I and II together would describe the genuine inductive characteristics rather than the exceptions. Thus, this option does not align with the idea of selecting the exceptions and is not the correct choice for the exception set.

Option III and IV: Both III (top-down reasoning) and IV (reasoning method that deals with certainty) are not inductive characteristics. Top-down reasoning is traditionally associated with deductive reasoning, and seeking certainty is more aligned with deductive certainty than induction. Therefore, the combination III and IV cleanly identifies the non-inductive aspects and represents a coherent set of statements that are not part of inductive reasoning. This makes III and IV a consistent and exclusive pair of exceptions among the options.

Question at position 34 II and IIII onlyI and IIII and IIIII and IV

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Question at position 21 Human beings will often reason from the specific to the general. That is, people often will form general rules and concepts based on specific experiences and examples. This type of reasoning is termedmetacognitionproblem spacinginductive reasoningdeductive reasoningsubgoaling

Question at position 3 A dog bit Sam when he was a small child, and now Sam believes all dogs bite. Which of the following is a type of reasoning that Sam is using to come to this conclusion?InductiveDeductiveIconicEchoic

Real-world observations lead to new ideas in which type of reasoning?

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler