Inductive arguments are subjective in nature.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The prompt asks us to evaluate the statement: 'Inductive arguments are subjective in nature.'
Option 1: 'True' — This claim would assert that inductive arguments are inherently subjective. In methodological terms, inductive reasoning is typically described as reasoning from specific observations to general conclusions with varying degrees of probability, rather than relying on absolute certainty. While individual researchers may bring perspectives that influence interpretation, the core nature of induction is not defined as subjective; it is defined by its reliance on evidence and probabilistic support. Therefore labeling inductive arguments as subjective would mischaracterize the standard view, because objectivity (in the sense of using evidence and probability) is a defining feature of inductive reasoning, even though conclusions are not guaranteed.
Option 2: 'False' — This statement denies that inductive arguments are subjective. The more accurate description is that inductive arguments are probabilistic and contingent on the strength and breadth of the evidence. They aim to provide reasons that increase the likelihood of a general claim, not to establish necessity. While personal biases can influence how evidence is selected or weighed, the nature of induction itself is not defined as subjective; it is a method of reasoning grounded in empirical support and probability.
In considering the contrast between the two options, you can see that the idea of induction being strictly subjective clashes with its standard characterization as evidence-based and probabilistic reasoning. The emphasis on probability, likelihood, and empirical support distinguishes inductive reasoning from purely subjective judgments. Therefore, the presented statement does not align with the conventional understanding of inductive arguments.

Inductive arguments are subjective in nature.

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Consider the following argument: Observation: Here in Nashville, the sun has risen every morning. Conclusion: The sun is going to rise in Nashville tomorrow.

London discusses Aristotle's view about the "productive sciences" or what we might call "applied sciences". According to Aristotle, what type of reasoning does the empiric use?

Which type of argument does the following example reflect? "Shakila learns that all her Chinese friends from Penang are able to speak Hokkien. Shakila comes to the conclusion that a majority of Chinese Penangites speak Hokkien."

"Only twelve people have ever walked on the moon. So the next person you meet did not walk on the moon." The above argument is:

Inductive reasoning is a logical process that begins with a theoretical prediction which is subsequently tested by gathering observations.

Real-world observations lead to new ideas in which type of reasoning?

Which of the following are all inductive arguments?

(27) T/F: Justus shows that inductive inferences can include mathematical calculations, and models in conjunction with deductive reasoning.

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler