Under s8-1(1)(b) ITAA97, an expense that is "necessarily incurred in carrying on a business":

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Re-stating the question and all answer options to begin the analysis: Under s8-1(1)(b) ITAA97, an expense that is "necessarily incurred in carrying on a business":

Option 1: 'must be a necessary expense of the business' — This framing emphasizes that the expense must be necessary. However, the correct interpretation under the provision is more nuanced: the idea is that the expense need not be strictly 'necessary' in the common sense, but must be connected to carrying on the business and be appropriate and adapted to its ends. Thus this option is too restrictive and does not capture the broader wording of the statute, which allows for expenses that are appropriate and adapted even if not strictly necessary.

Option 2: 'does not need to be a necessary expense, however must be an expense that is appropriate and adapted to the ends or purposes of the business carried on' — This option aligns with a nuanced reading of s8-1(1)(b) in many Australian tax contexts, which emphasizes that while the expense must be connected to carrying on the business, it does not have to be strictly 'necessary' in the narrow sense; it must be appropriate and adapted to the business’s ends or purposes. This captures the balance between linkage to business activities and the flexibility in determining deductibility.

Option 3: 'must be an essential and relevant expense of the business' — The word 'essential' is stronger than what s8-1(1)(b) typically requires. While the expense should be relevant to the business, the statute does not necessarily mandate 'essential' as a test. This overstates the bar by insisting on essentiality, which is not the standard term used in the provision.

Option 4: 'must be a foreseeable business expense' — Foreseeability is not the controlling criterion in s8-1(1)(b). Deductibility concerns whether the expense is incurred in carrying on the business and is not of a capital, private or non-income-producing nature. Focusing on foreseeability adds an unnecessary forecasting requirement rather than addressing the connection to the ordinary course of business.

Delving into the reasoning behind each option, the central concept is the link between the expense and carrying on the business. The tax rule targets expenses that arise in the ordinary course of activities aimed at earning assessable income, requiring that the expense be appropriate and adapted to the business’s purposes. Options that overemphasize necessity or essentiality introduce an unnecessary rigidity, whereas the tolerance for non-strict necessity is reflected in the correct choice. Options that rely on foreseeability or misstate the applicable test are misaligned with the statutory language and common tax interpretation, which focus on the nexus to business activities rather than prediction of expense occurrence.

In summary, the reasoning shows why the statement that an expense does not need to be strictly necessary but must be appropriate and adapted to the business ends is the correct interpretation, while the other options introduce mischaracterizations of the test under s8-1(1)(b) ITAA97.

77938 Introduction to Taxation Law - Spring 2025 Assessment 1: Multiple Choice

Under s8-1(1)(b) ITAA97, an expense that is "necessarily incurred in carrying on a business":

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

Under the assumptions used in cost-volume-profit analysis, as the activity increases:

The CVP and break-even analysis are supported by a range of important assumptions. Which of the following is not an assumption of the CVP:

The break-even point is that at which:

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler