Using the word "church" is more inclusive than the phrase "place of worship."

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question asks whether the statement "Using the word 'church' is more inclusive than the phrase 'place of worship'" is true or false.
Option 1: True. This option claims that 'church' is more inclusive than 'place of worship'. One common concern in inclusive language is whether a term encompasses a broader group or is more welcoming to diverse beliefs. However, in many contexts, selecting a specific term like 'church' can actually be less inclusive because it signals a particular religious tradition and may exclude other faiths or non-religious places people gather for worship.
Option 2: False. This option asserts that 'church' is not more inclusive than 'place of worship'. Several considerations support this: 'place of worship' is a neutral, umbrella term that can refer to any organized space used for worship by people of any faith, including temples, mosques, synagogues, churches, and other assemblies. Using 'place of worship' avoids implying allegiance to a single tradition and is therefore more inclusive for diverse audiences. Furthermore, when aiming for inclusivity in pluralistic settings (interfaith events, public communications, or policy language), neutral phrases reduce the risk of favoring one group over another.
Option 1 revisited: while some readers might perceive 'church' as familiar or community-centered, it inherently centers a specific religious institution and can unintentionally exclude people who worship elsewhere or who identify as secular. This weakens the claim of greater inclusivity.
Option 2 revisited: the notion of inclusivity benefits from terminology that welcomes all faiths and beliefs. 'Place of worship' functions as a broad descriptor that covers multiple traditions, making it the more inclusive choice in most contexts.
Option 1 is therefore not aligned with inclusive language principles because it assigns a higher level of inclusivity to a term tied to one particular tradition, rather than to a neutral descriptor that encompasses all religious gatherings.
Option 2 provides a clearer rationale for why the neutral phrase improves inclusivity by avoiding assumptions about which beliefs are being referenced.
Option 2 also helps prevent linguistic bias in communications intended for diverse audiences, whereas Option 1 risks signaling preference or exclusion depending on the audience and context.

202503_Interpersonal Communication_COMM_1041_15 QUIZ#4- Requires Respondus LockDown Browser 202503_Interpersonal Communication_COMM_1041_15 QUIZ#4- Requires Respondus LockDown Browser

Using the word "church" is more inclusive than the phrase "place of worship."

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

What is one of the four key concepts based off the Style Guides for Inclusive Language developed by the nonprofit, Some of Us, and discussed by Kelly Kitagawa?

Select the more inclusive term.

Select the inclusive term.

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler