Question at position 4 Creating well-defined procedures and checklistsFocusing solely on detection mechanismsPurchasing additional security softwareHiring more staff

Question

Question at position 4 Creating well-defined procedures and checklistsFocusing solely on detection mechanismsPurchasing additional security softwareHiring more staff

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question restatement: In the preparation stage, what can improve the effectiveness of the eradiation and recovery stages? The answer options are:
1) Creating well-defined procedures and checklists
2) Focusing solely on detection mechanisms
3) Purchasing additional security software
4) Hiring more staff

Option 1: Creating well-defined procedures and checklists. This choice is correct because the preparation stage emphasizes establishing standardized processes, runbooks, and checklists that guide incident response, eradiation, and recovery. Clear procedures reduce ambiguity, ensure consistent actions, facilitate coordination across teams, and enable faster, more reliable execution when an incident occurs.

Option 2: Focusing solely on detection mechanisms. While detection is important, concentrating only on detection neglects the proactive and coordinated response required in preparation, eradication, and recovery. Detection without prepared playbooks leads to delays and inconsistent reactions, so this option is too narrow.

Option 3: Purchasing additional security software. Investing in tools can help, but in the preparation stage, the emphasis should be on defining processes and ensuring teams know how to act. Software alone does not guarantee effective eradication or recovery unless accompanied by well-defined procedures and trained personnel.

Option 4: Hiring more staff. Additional personnel can assist, but simply increasing headcount without established procedures may not improve eradication and recovery efficiency. The root value here is having documented, repeatable steps; staffing is supportive but not the core driver of preparation effectiveness.

In summary, the reasoning highlights that structured, repeatable procedures and checklists directly enhance the readiness and reliability of the eradication and recovery phases, whereas the other options describe elements that are complementary but not sufficient on their own in the preparation stage.

Question at position 4 Creating well-defined procedures and checklistsFocusing solely on detection mechanismsPurchasing additional security softwareHiring more staff

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

During incident containment, which action is correct?

Question at position 19 When the attack is minor and unlikely to escalateWhen the root cause of the incident has been identified and requires extensive remediationWhen an organization has unlimited resourcesWhen there is a lack of skilled personnel to manage the incident

Question at position 17 NIST Special Publication 800-61r1 NIST Special Publication 800-61r2 NIST Special Publication (SP) 800-53NIST Special Publication 800-86

Question at position 8 By identifying the types of incidents that might occurBy establishing the budget for cybersecurity measuresBy mapping out potential escape routes for personnelBy pre-defining containment strategies for different types of incidents

Question at position 23 System configuration filesEmails from the target’s inboxFinancial data of the organizationUser account informationClear my selection

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler