A substantial body of evidence has shown that white and black raters:

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question asks about findings from a substantial body of evidence on raters, comparing white and black raters, in the context of performance ratings.
Option 1: 'tend to give lower ratings to members of their similar racial group.' This runs counter to much social-psychology research on rating biases, which often shows a similarity bias leading to higher ratings for in-group members rather than universally lower ratings. As a result, this option reflects an unlikely direction of bias given the typical patterns studied.
Option 2: 'tend to give higher ratings to seniors over younger workers.' While bias based on age could occur in some contexts, the statement shifts the focus from race to age and does not address racial similarity between raters and ratees. The question specifically concerns white and black raters, so this option introduces a different dimension and is not aligned with the given evidence about racial similarity effects.
Option 3: 'tend to give higher ratings to women over men.' This option concerns gender bias, not racial similarity between raters and ratees. Since the prompt emphasizes racial groups (white and black), this answer drifts away from the core topic and is not about racial similarity biases.
Option 4: 'tend to give higher ratings to members of their similar racial group.' This statement aligns with well-documented findings on in-group bias in performance ratings, where raters tend to rate individuals who share their racial group more favorably, reflecting similarity-attraction and social identity processes. This pattern has been observed across multiple studies and contexts, making it the most consistent with the reported evidence.
In summary, options 1, 2, and 3 address biases along other dimensions (dislike of in-group, age, and gender) or misstate the direction of bias, while option 4 coherently describes the established phenomenon of similarity-based advantages in ratings between white and black raters and ratees. The reasoning hinges on the idea that in-group similarity can influence evaluative judgments, leading to higher ratings for those who resemble the rater. Note that each distractor blends a plausible-sounding claim with a misalignment to the core racial-similarity finding, which is why they are considered incorrect within this question's context.

A substantial body of evidence has shown that white and black raters:

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

According to social identity theory, what is in-group favoritism?

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler