Investigators should accept other people's opinions and use this information as a starting point for developing a hypothesis.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Consider what the statement is claiming: investigators should simply accept other people's opinions and use them as the starting point for developing a hypothesis. This is a simplistic view of hypothesis formation. In rigorous research, while expert input and existing literature can inform ideas, hypotheses are typically grounded in prior evidence, theory, and systematic evidence gathering rather than uncritical acceptance of opinions. Relying on personal or external opinions without evaluating their basis can introduce bias, reflect subjective beliefs, or perpetuate untested assumptions. A more sound approach involves conducting a literature review, identifying gaps in knowledge, formulating testable predictions, and then designing studies to test those predictions. Additionally, hypotheses should be falsifiable and derived from the current state of knowledge, not from informal consensus or authority alone. Therefore, the notion that investigators should simply accept opinions as the starting point is not consistent with standard scientific practice. Some nuance exists in that expert input can help generate hypotheses, but it should be weighed against evidence and theory rather than taken as given. Option analysis: the idea of accepting opinions uncritically is flawed because it bypasses critical appraisal, introduces potential biases, and undermines the objective testability of a hypothesis; leveraging evidence-based reasoning and methodological rigor is preferable to relying on personal opinions alone.

Investigators should accept other people's opinions and use this information as a starting point for developing a hypothesis.

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Which of these is NOT part of making a hypothesis/prediction:

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

Under the assumptions used in cost-volume-profit analysis, as the activity increases:

The CVP and break-even analysis are supported by a range of important assumptions. Which of the following is not an assumption of the CVP:

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler