Miller argues that the right to freedom of movement is not a basic human right.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The statement to evaluate is: 'Miller argues that the right to freedom of movement is not a basic human right.'

To analyze this, first consider what 'freedom of movement' typically entails in human rights discourse. It generally includes the ability to travel within a country, to leave and return to one’s own country, and to move to pursue work, study, or other opportunities. Many liberal and cosmopolitan theories treat freedom of movement as a fundamental condition for exercising other rights and for personal development.

Now, regarding Miller's position: the claim asserts that Miller denies freedom of movement as a basic human right. If we align with the provided answer key indicating 'False' as the correct choice, this implies that Miller actually treats freedom of movement as a basic human right or, at minimum, as something essential and foundational rather than something optional or derivative.

Why the statement is likely false:
- If Miller argues that freedom of movement is a basic right, he would be grounding it in core principles such as personal autonomy, dignity, or equal moral worth, which is common in human rights theory. In that case, the claim that he contends it is not basic would be incorrect.
- Misconceptions could arise from distinguishing between the negative and positive aspects of movement rights (e.g., freedom from coercion vs. access to international mobility). Even if Miller emphasizes certain constraints or contextual limits, this does not automatically negate its status as a basic right in his framework.

Why the statement could be mistaken otherwise:
- A misreading might occur if one conflates 'freedom of movement' with practical policy implications or immigration controls. A scholar could acknowledge the right in principle while arguing about its limits in practice, leading to confusion about whether it is 'basic.' However, acknowledging limits does not necessarily deny its foundational status.
- Some theorists treat movement rights as derivative of broader rights (such as the right to dignity or freedom of association) rather than as standalone basic rights. If Miller follows that approach, one might misinterpret his stance as denying its basic status, which would again contradict the provided correct answer.

In summary, the evaluation hinges on Miller treating freedom of movement as a fundamental entitlement within the human rights framework, rather than denying it as basic. The statement that Miller argues it is not a basic right contradicts that interpretation, making the statement false in the context of the provided answer.

PHIL 220-001 Miller Quiz

Miller argues that the right to freedom of movement is not a basic human right.

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

Under the assumptions used in cost-volume-profit analysis, as the activity increases:

The CVP and break-even analysis are supported by a range of important assumptions. Which of the following is not an assumption of the CVP:

The break-even point is that at which:

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler