In this week's lecture, we discussed a famous US-American scientist. His goal was to create a mathematical proof for the existence of retrogression within his scientific domain.

True or False?

Question

In this week's lecture, we discussed a famous US-American scientist. His goal was to create a mathematical proof for the existence of retrogression within his scientific domain.

True or False?

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question restatement: In this week's lecture, we discussed a famous US-American scientist. His goal was to create a mathematical proof for the existence of retrogression within his scientific domain. True or False?

Option 1: True. This choice asserts that the lecturer described a renowned United States scientist whose objective was to establish, via a mathematical proof, that retrogression exists in his field. The reasoning behind marking this as True would be that the lecture explicitly presented such a claim, and the instructor framed retrogression as an existent phenomenon that could be demonstrated through formal proof within that domain. If the lecturer emphasized a formal proof strategy and tied it to a well-known scientist’s work, this option aligns with the presented content. In evaluating this option, consider whether the lecture stated a proof-based existence claim and connected it to a prominent US figure; if so, True follows from the material.

Option 2: False. This choice denies that the scientist aimed to prove the existence of retrogression, or denies the attribution of retrogression to that domain, or denies that such a proof was the goal discussed in the lecture. Reasons this could be considered incorrect include: the lecturer might have described retrogression as a conjecture, an interpretive idea, or a phenomenon that was not claimed to be proven mathematically; or the “famous US-American scientist” could be a misidentification or the focus of the lecture was on a different objective (e.g., a qualitative theory, a heuristic argument, or a historical overview) rather than a strict mathematical proof of existence. Additionally, the target domain might not have a standard notion called “retrogression,” making a formal proof improbable or inapplicable in real-world terms. If the lecture clearly rejected the idea that such a proof existed or that retrogression could be proven within the specified domain, then False would be justified.

Summary: Since the given answer field marks True as the correct answer, the explanation for True should connect to the claim that the lecture presented a US-American scientist whose aim was to provide a mathematical proof for the existence of retrogression in his field. The explanation for False should address why one might doubt this claim—such as misinterpretation of what retrogression means, or the absence of a formal proof goal in the lecture—highlighting that these would be reasons to select False if the lecture content contradicted the statement.

HPSC2011 (ND) Quiz Week 3

In this week's lecture, we discussed a famous US-American scientist. His goal was to create a mathematical proof for the existence of retrogression within his scientific domain. True or False?

查看解析

登录即可查看完整答案

类似问题

Based on the film watched in class, many groundbreaking researchers were killed from exposure to radiation.

Before the sciences was considered a legitimate course of study in universities, they were considered what?

Who first introduced Charles Darwin and evolution by natural selection to the Chinese?

Maienschein claims that studying the history of science can improve science's efficiency. What does she mean by this? (Check BOTH that apply)

Which of the following are arguments Maienschein discusses in favor of studying the history of science? (Check BOTH that apply)

Question at position 7 TrueFalse

更多留学生实用工具

考试浏览器助手

风格化写作助手

论文查重助手

文献引用助手

课堂转译助手

课堂笔记助手

Quiz搜索助手

学校历年真题

智能刷题助手

智能匹配练习

希望你的学习变得更简单