Assume the case of the USA and Mexico. It’s known that the USA has much higher labor supply than Mexico and it’s much more endowed with capital as well. How are these two countries expected to be interpreted by Heckscher-Ohlin model in terms of production factors availability? Select one – the most appropriate answer.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

To approach this question, I’ll evaluate what the Heckscher-Ohlin (H-O) model predicts about factor endowments and production, given that the USA is more capital-abundant and Mexico is more labor-abundant. The model suggests countries will specialize in and trade goods that intensively use their abundant factors.
Option 1: 'Mexico is to be considered as labor abundant economy since the level of capital abundancy in the USA is definitely much higher; the USA is considered as labor and capital abundant economy.' This statement is misleading. While it correctly notes the USA has more capital, it goes further to say the USA is abundant in both labor and capital, which contradicts the comparative advantage logic where the US is capital-abundant and Mexico is labor-abundant, not abundant in both factors. The claim of universal abundance misses the core H-O distinction.
Option 2: 'Mexico will be interpreted as labor abundant economy while the USA as capital abundant.' This aligns with the H-O framework: Mexico’s relative labor endowment is higher, so it specializes in labor-intensive goods, while the USA’s relative capital endowment is higher, leading to capital-intensive production. This is the standard interpretation under the model for two-country, two-factor settings, given the stated endowments.
Option 3: 'USA is expected to be interpreted as an economy with labor intensive as well as capital intensive production pattern; Mexico is expected to have only labor-intensive production.' This overstates a single-country production pattern. The H-O model does not claim the USA would simultaneously be exclusively labor- and capital-intensive across all sectors; it predicts comparative advantage by sector based on relative factor intensities. The phrasing here is too absolute and ignores sectoral specialization.
Option 4: 'Mexico will be interpreted as labor and capital scarce economy and USA is to be considered as labor scarce economy.' This directly contradicts the given information and the core H-O intuition. If anything, the USA is capital-rich relative to Mexico, not labor-scarce by universal standard, and Mexico is not characterized as scarce in both factors in the model’s typical two-good, two-factor setup.
In summary, Option 2 best captures the Heckscher-Ohlin interpretation for the described endowments, while Options 1, 3, and 4 introduce mischaracterizations about endowments or production patterns that diverge from the model’s core predictions.

econ_420_120255_249094 Lesson 5 Quiz 2

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Question at position 5 Which theory suggests that nations will develop comparative advantages based on their locally abundant factors?Heckscher-Ohlin theoryAbsolute advantage theoryProduct life cycle theoryStrategic trade theory

Question at position 21 The focus of factor proportions theory is on the __.productivity of the production processcost-effectiveness of the production processuse of depleting production factorsuse of expensive production factors

Considering the diagram below identify which sector is capital-intensive and which is labor-intensive given the reasoning provided. Select one – the most appropriate answer, considering provisions of Heckscher-Ohlin model of international trade.

Considering the diagram below identify which sector is capital-intensive and which is labor-intensive given the reasoning provided. Select one – the most appropriate answer, considering provisions of Heckscher-Ohlin model of international trade.

Consider the problem of wage inequality gap in the USA. How would you explain this problem accepting provisions of Heckscher-Ohlin model? Select one – the most appropriate answer.

Assume a labor abundant economy and you are considering the income distribution effect on this economy resulting from international trade. Pick a statement that can best describe that effect, given provisions of Heckscher-Ohlin model. Select one – the most appropriate answer.

Among the given statements pick one that best describes the diagram below (Heckscher-Ohlin model). Select one – the most appropriate answer.

Pick one statement that can be best used to describe the diagram below. Select one – the most appropriate answer, considering provisions of Heckscher-Ohlin model.

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler