How much more do Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people experience blindness compared to that of non-Indigenous Australians?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question asks: How much more do Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people experience blindness compared to that of non-Indigenous Australians?

Given information: There are no answer options provided in the data, and the provided answer list contains a single entry: "3 times more".

Option analysis:
- Statement: "3 times more" (the only listed option) would mean that the prevalence or risk of blindness is threefold higher in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people compared with non-Indigenous Australians. To evaluate this claim, one would need reliable epidemiological data comparing blindness prevalence between the two groups, ideally from a national health survey or a population health study. Without the accompanying data or context, we cannot confirm whether threefold is accurate, overestimated, or understated.
- If we assume threefold is true, the interpretation would be that the Indigenous group has roughly 200% higher risk (since 3x implies an increase by a factor of three relative to the baseline). This would have to be supported by clear definitions of blindness (e.g., presenting blindness vs. best-corrected vision), the study population, age-adjustment, and how blindness is measured. A robust conclusion would also consider potential confounders such as access to eye care, socioeconomic factors, and comorbid conditions.
- If the statement were false, the actual difference could be smaller or larger, or there might be no difference after appropriate adjustments. In many health disparity assessments, Indigenous populations experience higher burdens of preventable vision problems due to disparities in access to services, which could manifest as higher blindness rates in certain contexts, but the exact multiplier varies by dataset and definition.

Limitations due to missing options:
- Since no other answer choices are provided, we cannot compare the proposed "3 times more" against alternatives like "2 times more," "1.5 times more," "no difference," or other phrasings such as "significantly more" with quantified data. Without a set of choices, the evaluation is limited to discussing the plausibility and interpretation of the single claim.

What would strengthen evaluation here:
- Access to the full list of answer options and the source of the data (e.g., a specific health report or surveillance system).
- Clarification on definitions (types of blindness included, age adjustments, presenting vs. best-c corrected vision).
- The date and population scope of the data to ensure relevancy and comparability.

In summary, the single option provided—"3 times more"—is a quantitative claim that requires supporting epidemiological data to verify. The absence of additional options and source details makes it impossible to determine, from the given information alone, whether this statement is correct, incorrect, or how it compares to alternative possible answers.

2025_MEDH_SMP_YEAR_2 KAT 7 Practice Exam 2025

How much more do Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people experience blindness compared to that of non-Indigenous Australians?

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

People who live in rural areas have less access to health care and are less likely to engage in physical activity than people who live in either suburbs or urban areas.

What was a central finding of the Whitehall study (Marmot et al., 1984) with the British civil servants?

The video “How Racism Makes People Sick” discussed care inequities and biases in society and among providers.

Question at position 48 Health disparities are inequalities in health, health care, and health behaviors across different racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic groups. TrueFalse

According to the article, why do poor American have lower life expectancies than wealthier Americans?

Which statement is TRUE regarding health disparities and the uninsured?

Which of the following is NOT a reason for racial disparities in life expectancy?

TRUE OR FALSE: According to Chang and Lauderdale, even if a new medical technology shows relative advantage, lack of complexity, compatibility, and trialability, it can still increase inequalities in health outcomes.

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler