How should a student dispute a marking error according to the course syllabus?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question restatement: The prompt asks how a student should dispute a marking error according to the course syllabus, and provides four answer options.
Option a: 'Ignore it, as the syllabus does not specify a procedure' This choice suggests neglecting the issue and assumes no procedure exists. If the syllabus actually outlines a process, ignoring it is inappropriate and may forfeit a legitimate appeal. Generally, official procedures exist for disputes, so this option is weak.
Option b: 'Discuss it with classmates and hope for a resolution' Relying on peers rather than following formal channels undermines the proper avenue for dispute resolution. Classmates may have opinions, but a syllabus usually directs formal steps; informal discussion alone is unlikely to yield a binding correction.
Option c: 'Submit a written request, identifying the error and justifying why the answer is correct' This option describes a formal, document-based approach: a written request that clearly identifies the specific error and provides justification. This aligns with common academic procedures that require a formal appeal or dispute with justification, making it a strong, procedure-oriented choice.
Option d: 'Verbally inform the instructor' While notifying the instructor is part of processes in some contexts, many syllabi require a formal written appeal rather than a casual verbal note. Verbal communication alone may not constitute an official record or provide the necessary justification, so this option is incomplete or insufficient on its own.
Additional nuance: The correct procedure typically involves a documented appeal that specifies the exact marking issue and explains why the answer aligns with course materials or rubric. A written format plus justification ensures there is a traceable record and a clear basis for review. In contrast, the other options either bypass formal channels, rely on informal debate, or lack necessary documentation, which undermines the integrity of the dispute process.
In summary, option c is the most appropriate because it codifies a formal, justified, written appeal, whereas the other options fail to meet standard syllabus-prescribed dispute protocols or rely on informal methods that may not be accepted for resolution.

ENTR 3100 A10 SPRING 2025 Quiz on the course syllabus

How should a student dispute a marking error according to the course syllabus?

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

Under the assumptions used in cost-volume-profit analysis, as the activity increases:

The CVP and break-even analysis are supported by a range of important assumptions. Which of the following is not an assumption of the CVP:

The break-even point is that at which:

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler