What relationship exists between the winds at 2,000 feet above the surface and the surface winds?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Let’s examine the question about the relationship between winds aloft at 2,000 feet and surface winds.
Option 1: The winds at 2,000 feet and the surface winds flow in the same direction, but the surface winds are weaker due to friction.
While it is true that surface winds are weaker due to surface friction, they do not necessarily flow in the same direction as the winds at 2,000 feet. The aloft wind direction tends to be more uniform with height, whereas surface winds can cross isobars and shift direction due to friction, often resulting in a crosswind component relative to higher-level winds.
Option 2: The winds at 2,000 feet tend to parallel the isobars while the surface winds cross the isobars at an angle toward lower pressure and are weaker.
This statement aligns with the standard understanding: at higher levels, winds tend to follow isobars more closely and maintain a direction influenced by pressure gradients with less friction. Near the surface, friction slows the wind and causes it to cross the isobars at an angle toward lower pressure, typically reducing horizontal speed. This captures both the geostrophic-like behavior aloft and the frictional deflection at the surface.
Option 3: The surface winds tend to veer to the right of the winds at 2,000 feet and are usually weaker.
Veering to the right is a term used in some contexts, particularly in the Northern Hemisphere with clockwise turning with increasing altitude, but this option implies a consistent rightward turn relative to 2,000-foot winds and also asserts they are usually weaker without mentioning the cross-isobar behavior. It mixes concepts (veering vs. cross-isobar flow) and can be misleading because the primary, more general relationship emphasized in aviation and meteorology is the parallel/alignment aloft with isobars and the cross-isobar, friction-influenced surface winds, rather than a simple rightward veer.
In summary, option 2 correctly describes the classic relationship: aloft winds resemble parallel to isobars (geostrophic-like), while surface winds are slowed by friction and cross the isobars toward lower pressure, resulting in weaker speeds and a crosswind component.
The other options either overstate uniform direction from surface to aloft, misstate the cross-isobar behavior, or introduce veering without addressing the frictional and pressure-gradient dynamics that drive the familiar wind pattern between 2,000 feet and the surface.

FA25: AVIA-62 Sec 01 - Instru Pilot Ground SU8/SU9: Weather & Weather Services Quiz SP25

What relationship exists between the winds at 2,000 feet above the surface and the surface winds?

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Geostrophic winds are most common near the Earth's surface.

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

Under the assumptions used in cost-volume-profit analysis, as the activity increases:

The CVP and break-even analysis are supported by a range of important assumptions. Which of the following is not an assumption of the CVP:

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler