In a study on the consequences of hurricane names, authors described a model of destruction that suggests changing a name from Charlie to Eloise would nearly triple the expected death toll.

What was the mechanism they suggested that could drive this effect?

Question

In a study on the consequences of hurricane names, authors described a model of destruction that suggests changing a name from Charlie to Eloise would nearly triple the expected death toll.

What was the mechanism they suggested that could drive this effect?

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Here is the question and the available answer options restated for clarity:
Question: In a study on the consequences of hurricane names, authors described a model of destruction that suggests changing a name from Charlie to Eloise would nearly triple the expected death toll. What was the mechanism they suggested that could drive this effect?
Options:
1) states provide less funding for disaster relief for hurricanes with masculine-sounding names than feminine-sounding names.
2) the authors found that gender differences did not cause this effect, but instead, how old-fashioned the names sounded produced differences ("older" female names).
3) hurricanes with more feminine names are more associated with passive stereotypes, which will lead to fewer protective actions being taken.
4) hurricanes that form from tropical waters are deadlier, and are assigned feminine names; hurricanes from non-tropical waters are less deadly, and are assigned masculine names.

Option-by-option analysis:
Option 1: states provide less funding for disaster relief for hurricanes with masculine-sounding names than feminine-sounding names.
This option attributes the mechanism to differential funding decisions by states based on the perceived gender of the name. The study as described does not typically frame funding allocations as the mechanism driving mortality differences based on name gender; such a causal chain would require evidence of policy-level action tied specifically to names. Moreover, the described mechanism in the study is more about behavior and protective actions by individuals, not about discretionary funding by states. Therefore, this option misidentifies the level and nature of the causal pathway and is unlikely to be correct.

Option 2: the authors found that gender differences did not cause this effect, but instead, how old-fashioned the names sounded produced differences ("older" female names).
This option shifts the mechanism from gender stereotypes to the perceived age or antiquated quality of names. While perceptual biases about names could theoretically influence behavior, the specific proposed mechanism in the literature about hurricane naming and protective behavior centers on gendered stereotypes rather than perceived age of the name. If the study emphasized older-sounding names as the driver, that would present a different narrative than the gendered stereotype mechanism. Given the stated mechanism in the question, this option does not align with the described finding.

Option 3: hurricanes with more feminine names are more associated with passive stereotypes, which will lead to fewer protective actions being taken.
This option articulates a mechanism grounded in social psychology: feminine names linked to passive stereotypes may influence risk perception and response behaviors, leading individuals to engage in fewer protective measures (e.g., evacuation, preparation). It directly connects name gender to behavioral outcomes and, consequently, to mortality risk. This aligns with the commonly reported mechanism in studies on hurricane naming effects, where gendered perceptions shape actions and outcomes. Thus, this option presents a coherent and plausible causal pathway consistent with the described study.

Option 4: hurricanes that form from tropical waters are deadlier, and are assigned feminine names; hurricanes from non-tropical waters are less deadly, and are assigned masculine names.
This option asserts a physical difference based on the origin of the hurricane and ties it to the name gender. However, death toll differences attributed to naming are not about the meteorological origin of storms; rather, they’re about human responses to perceived threat. The suggestion that the naming system is causally linked to the storm’s formation environment introduces a confounded and implausible mechanism if mortality differences are observed merely from naming, making this option an unlikely explanation.

In summary, option 3 presents the mechanism that best fits the described study: feminine names are linked to passive stereotypes, which can dampen protective actions and thereby elevate mortality risk. The other options either misplace the causal level (policy/funding), hinge on a less supported attribute (older-sounding names), or mix meteorology with naming in an implausible way (origin-based gender associations).

In a study on the consequences of hurricane names, authors described a model of destruction that suggests changing a name from Charlie to Eloise would nearly triple the expected death toll. What was the mechanism they suggested that could drive this effect?

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

When it comes to competition and choice - males always compete and females always choose.

The textbook describes a study where researchers asked adults to watch a video of two children (whose gender they could not identify). Adults were then asked to rate the children’s level of aggression. The adults who believed that _____ rated the children as least aggressive.

In the 2016 U.S. presidential campaign, candidate Hillary Clinton was described as ‘ambitious, goal-focused, strategic, “wanting” the presidency.’ In her case, these descriptors were used to

2. Which of the following is an example of stereotyping in advertising?

Which GENDER STEREOTYPE and CATEGORY do the following traits belong to: autocratic. severe. stern. aggressive. dominant.

Broad categories that reflect general impressions and beliefs about males and females, such as "boys play with trucks and girls play with dolls," are known as gender

Women tend to be rated as more effective leaders in what domains?

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler