In the 2016 U.S. presidential campaign, candidate Hillary Clinton was described as ‘ambitious, goal-focused, strategic, “wanting” the presidency.’ In her case, these descriptors were used to

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The prompt asks about how the descriptors used for Hillary Clinton—‘ambitious, goal-focused, strategic, “wanting” the presidency’—were used in the 2016 campaign.
Since the answer_options field is empty, we only have the provided answer to analyze: "criticize her as seeming “power-hungry” as though women are not legitimately supposed to pursue power." 
First, consider what this option is claiming: it suggests that these descriptors were employed as a way to frame her in gendered terms, implying a negative judgment—she is “power-hungry”—and implying that women are not legitimately entitled to pursue or hold power. This identifies a potential double standard in political rhetoric where ambition in a female candidate is characterized as a negative trait, whereas similar ambition in male candidates might be normalized or even celebrated. 
Next, examine the underlying assumption: labeling women as power-hungry relies on stereotypes about women’s appropriate roles and emotional responses to power. This option highlights a common critique that gendered rhetoric can moralize female leadership, casting ambition as a flaw rather than a neutral or positive attribute. It also points to the broader issue of how political communication can reinforce gender biases by framing ambition through a lens of gendered expectations rather than evaluating qualifications or policy positions. 
From a critical perspective, this option would be accurate if the question intends to illustrate how campaign rhetoric can pathologize female ambition and frame power-seeking as undesirable for women specifically. It contrasts with how male candidates’ similar traits might be described in less stigmatizing terms, if at all, thereby exposing a bias in discourse.
If we consider the broader context of the other possible answer choices (which are not provided), we would evaluate whether descriptors like ambitious or strategic are used to justify competence and leadership, or whether they’re weaponized to delegitimize a woman’s pursuit of office. However, given only the single option, the key takeaway is that this characterization reveals a gendered double standard in political rhetoric, illustrating how the same traits can be interpreted differently depending on the candidate’s gender.
In sum, the reasoning behind this option hinges on detecting gender bias in the use of positive descriptors, showing how they can morph into criticisms that men might not face, thereby casting ambition as inappropriate for women seeking power. The absence of other options prevents a full comparative analysis, but the provided choice remains a plausible interpretation of how such descriptors could be used to criticize a female candidate by appealing to gendered expectations about power.

ANT2000-25Summer AW60 Quiz 12

In the 2016 U.S. presidential campaign, candidate Hillary Clinton was described as ‘ambitious, goal-focused, strategic, “wanting” the presidency.’ In her case, these descriptors were used to

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

When it comes to competition and choice - males always compete and females always choose.

The textbook describes a study where researchers asked adults to watch a video of two children (whose gender they could not identify). Adults were then asked to rate the children’s level of aggression. The adults who believed that _____ rated the children as least aggressive.

2. Which of the following is an example of stereotyping in advertising?

Which GENDER STEREOTYPE and CATEGORY do the following traits belong to: autocratic. severe. stern. aggressive. dominant.

Broad categories that reflect general impressions and beliefs about males and females, such as "boys play with trucks and girls play with dolls," are known as gender

Women tend to be rated as more effective leaders in what domains?

In a study on the consequences of hurricane names, authors described a model of destruction that suggests changing a name from Charlie to Eloise would nearly triple the expected death toll. What was the mechanism they suggested that could drive this effect?

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler