Martin’s preschool study argues that gender is embodied mainly through children’s words and clothing rather than their bodily movement.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

We begin by restating the prompt: Martin’s preschool study argues that gender is embodied mainly through children’s words and clothing rather than their bodily movement.
Option 1: True. This statement claims that gender embodiment in preschoolers is primarily expressed via language and wardrobe rather than physical movement. In many theories of gender embodiment, researchers emphasize how social signals such as speech patterns, naming, clothing, and accessories convey gendered identities. However, this option asserts that words and clothing are the main channels, excluding bodily movement as a significant contributor. Depending on the study’s actual claim, emphasizing words and clothing while downplaying bodily movement may be inaccurate if the study also considers movement, play styles, gestures, and embodied actions as important indicators. Therefore, labeling this as the true statement risks overlooking other embodied dimensions, making this option questionable in terms of its completeness.
Option 2: False. This option states that the premise requested by the prompt is incorrect. If the preschool study indeed argues that gender embodiment is not mainly through words and clothing alone, but also involves bodily movement, then the claim would be false. In many developmental and gender-embodiment accounts, bodily movement—how children move, gesture, engage in physical play, and interact bodily with peers—forms a crucial aspect of gender presentation alongside speech and attire. Thus, recognizing movement as a significant channel aligns with broader theories that treat embodiment as multimodal, not dominated by one channel. Consequently, this statement being false would reflect the idea that gender embodiment cannot be reduced to words and clothing alone.
To differentiate between options: examine what the study emphasizes. If it explicitly foregrounds words and clothing as the main embodiment channels while downplaying movement, option True might seem supported. But if the study also highlights bodily movement as a key aspect, or if it critiques reduction to language/clothing, then option False would be more accurate. Since the prompt asks us to judge the truth value, and common interpretations in gender embodiment argue for multimodal expression including movement, the safer assessment is that the claim is not fully accurate, rendering the statement false.

SOC001 Lecture SOC 001 Midterm Exam

Martin’s preschool study argues that gender is embodied mainly through children’s words and clothing rather than their bodily movement.

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

As a result of differential treatment in schools, girls are socialized to be:

Gender socialization begins:

Sociological critics of gender socialization point out that:

Tania is given a doll for 2nd birthday, while her brother, Steven, is given a fire truck. This is an example of gender:

A As children, boys usually receive trucks, sporting equipment, and action toys. Girls receive stuffed animals and gifts that are more passive. This is an example of ________.

What conclusion would be most accurate based on the study of matrilineal and patriarchal villages in northeast India?

Which of the following is/are true of MVP?

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler