5. THELMA AND LOUISE made the cover of TIME magazine in 1992 and heralded the Year of the Woman, but actually things have not changed substantially for women in Hollywood films since.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The statement under consideration expresses a claim about gender representation in Hollywood films since 1992, tying it to Thelma and Louise gracing TIME and declaring that no substantial changes have occurred for women. 
Option 1: True
- The claim asserts stagnation; analyzing the broader context, some observers argue that symbolic milestones (like TIME covers or the Year of the Woman) did not translate into deep, lasting shifts in power, roles, or behind-the-scenes opportunities for many years. 
- It is important to consider metrics such as number of female directors, producers, writers, and executives, as well as the types of female-led roles and the depiction of women on screen. If one views these metrics and finds persistent gender gaps or limited access to top-tier creative positions, the argument for limited substantive change gains support. 
- However, the statement is nuanced: even if some progress has occurred in certain areas (e.g., more high-profile female-led projects in later years, advocacy, and policy discussions), the claim here asserts that overall change has not been substantial, which is a debated stance depending on the criteria used. 
Option 2: False
- This option would imply that substantial changes have occurred since 1992, such that the claim of no substantial change is inaccurate. 
- Arguments for this position point to increasing numbers of women in prominent roles (e.g., directing, producing, starring in major franchises, and receiving major awards), shifts toward more complex female protagonists, and greater attention to women’s stories in mainstream cinema. 
- Critics of the “no substantial change” claim would highlight concrete progress, such as the rise of female directors in independent and mainstream cinema, better, though still imperfect, access to decision-making positions, and a broader range of on-screen representations. 
In summary, the true/false evaluation hinges on which standard of change one uses (quantitative leadership positions, representation in leading roles, or qualitative shifts in storytelling). The first option centers on stagnation, while the second centers on evidence of change.

TDGE124_WI25_A00 LECTURE 9 QUIZ THELMA AND LOUISE

5. THELMA AND LOUISE made the cover of TIME magazine in 1992 and heralded the Year of the Woman, but actually things have not changed substantially for women in Hollywood films since.

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Overall, male athletes are more likely to be characterized for their athleticism, while female athletes, when compared to male athletes, are more likely to be depicted in terms related to their attractiveness.

Women’s and men’s athletic achievements are treated equally by the media.

In 2022, what is was the ratio of male to female characters on screen for US films?

answer all that apply: Sarkeesian claims that males are...

What is the male gaze?

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler