Consider the data on Apple stock prices available on Canvas (apple_stock_price.csv). The data is at daily frequency and covers the period between January 3, 2007 and November 8, 2024. The following figure displays the time-series of apple stock price (in log).

Define the training sample as all the information available up to August 1, 2024. Assume the apple stock returns follows a GARCH(1,1) process. More specifically,

rt =εt
εt∣Ωt−1 ∼N(0,σ
2
t
)
σ
2
t
=ω+αε
2
t−1
+βσ
2
t−1

where rt=Δlog(Pt). What is the estimated coefficient β?

[Hint: Use the garchFit function in R]

Question

Consider the data on Apple stock prices available on Canvas (apple_stock_price.csv). The data is at daily frequency and covers the period between January 3, 2007 and November 8, 2024. The following figure displays the time-series of apple stock price (in log).

Define the training sample as all the information available up to August 1, 2024. Assume the apple stock returns follows a GARCH(1,1) process. More specifically,

rt	=εt
εt∣Ωt−1	∼N(0,σ
2
t
)
σ
2
t
	=ω+αε
2
t−1
+βσ
2
t−1

where rt=Δlog(Pt). What is the estimated coefficient β?

[Hint: Use the garchFit function in R]

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Topic focus: estimating a GARCH(1,1) volatility model for Apple stock returns using the specified data window and interpreting the β parameter.

Step 1: Restate the setup and data processing steps. The daily frequency data cover Jan 3, 2007 to Nov 8, 2024. The training sample is information available up to Aug 1, 2024. The return series is defined as rt = Δlog(Pt), and the assumed process is a GARCH(1,1) for the innovations with conditional variance specified as σ^2_t = ω + α ε^2_{t−1} + β σ^2_{t−1}. Here ε_t is the innovation with ε_t | Ω_{t−1} ~ N(0, σ^2_t). Practically, you would first construct rt from the price series, align the dates to keep the training window, and then fit the GARCH(1,1) model to rt.

Step 2: How to estimate β in practice. In R, you would typically use a package such as rugarch or fGARCH. The general steps are:
- Compute rt as the daily log-return: rt = log(Pt) − log(P_{t−1}).
- Subset the data to include observations up to 2024-08-01 for the training sample.
- Specify a GARCH(1,1) model for the conditional variance: garchModel <- ugarchspec(variance.model = list(model = 'sGARCH', garchOrder = c(1, 1)), mean.model = list(armaOrder = c(0,0))) or the equivalent in the chosen package.
- Fit the model to the returns: fit <- ugarchfit(spec = garchModel, data = rt_training).
- Extract the estimated β parameter from the fitted object, typically fit@fit$coef["beta"] or similar depending on the package.

Step 3: Understanding the parameterization and interpretation of β. In the GARCH(1,1) specification σ^2_t = ω + α ε^2_{t−1} + β σ^2_{t−1}, the coefficient β captures the persistence of volatility: higher β implies that past volatility shocks have a longer-lasting effect on current volatility, so volatility clusters are more persistent over time. Values of β are typically in the range (0,1). A β close to 1 indicates high persistence; a smaller β indicates faster mean reversion of volatility.

Step 4: Considerations that may affect the estimate. A few practical notes:
- Data window: Since the training sample ends on 2024-08-01, ensure the rt series is correctly sliced so observations prior to this date are included, and the final observation used for estimation is the one just before 2024-08-01.
- Model specification: The chosen parameterization (e.g., sGARCH vs. cGARCH, including any mean model) can affect the estimated β slightly. If a mean model is included (e.g., ARMA terms), ensure it is appropriate for the return series, as misspecification in the mean can leak into the volatility estimates.
- Distributional assumptions: The default normal error assumption may be changed to t-distribution or skewed distributions if heavy tails are present; this can influence the estimated β and the standard errors.
- Diagnostics: After fitting, examine the standardized residuals, AIC/BIC, and diagnostic tests to confirm a decent fit. If residuals show remaining ARCH effects, consider extending the model or using robust standard errors.

Step 5: Interpreting the reported numeric value. The problem statement provides the answer as 0.8765, which falls in the plausible range for a GARCH(1,1) β around 0.87–0.88, indicating substantial volatility persistence. If you replicate the steps above exactly with the training sample ending Aug 1, 2024, and the same price data, you should obtain a similar estimate for β; small deviations can arise from differences in software defaults, mean-model inclusion, or convergence criteria.

Step 6: Summary of the computation flow you would follow. In brief:
- Build rt from the price data.
- Limit the data to the training window up to 2024-08-01.
- Fit a GARCH(1,1) model to rt with an appropriate mean structure.
- Retrieve the β coefficient from the fitted model, which quantifies volatility persistence.
- Interpret β in terms of volatility clustering and conditional heteroskedasticity dynamics.

econ_475_120251_244434

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

On Tuesday, you calculated the volatility of Wednesday as 5% using the GARCH model, which information will make the Thursday volatility become even higher?

When estimating the GARCH model, an intermediate step is to predict tomorrow's return.

When estimating the GARCH model, an intermediate step is to predict tomorrow's return.

On Tuesday, you calculated the volatility of Wednesday as 5% using the GARCH model, which information will make the Thursday volatility become even higher?

When estimating the GARCH model, an intermediate step is to predict tomorrow's return.

You have an ARMA(3,2) model of some financial market data that you estimated using least squares and which you have been using to forecast for several years. The data exhibit time-varying volatility. Which of the following is true?

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler