The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution guarantees freedom of speech for all individuals and in all cases.

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The statement under consideration is: 'The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution guarantees freedom of speech for all individuals and in all cases.'

Option 1: True. This option claims that the First Amendment provides absolute, universal freedom of speech in every context. In reality, the First Amendment protects freedom of speech from government restriction, but it does not subject to no limitations. There are well-established exceptions and qualifications, such as time, place, and manner restrictions, speech that incites imminent lawless action, true threats, defamation, obscenity, and certain national security or privacy concerns. Therefore, labeling the protection as unconditional and unlimited is inaccurate.

Option 2: False. This option correctly signals that the guarantee is not absolute. The First Amendment applies to government action and creates a framework through which speech is protected, but courts have recognized numerous exceptions and restrictions in various circumstances. For example, private actors may set their own speech rules, and even government-protected speech can be limited when it intersects with other compelling interests or specific harms. Additionally, certain categories of speech have been restricted (e.g., incitement, true threats, defamation). Hence, this statement captures the nuance that freedom of speech is not granted in all cases without exception.

In sum, the core misconception in the 'True' option is the claim of universality and absolutism, while the 'False' option aligns with constitutional doctrine that protections are robust but not unlimited, and subject to specific legal limits and contexts.

PRT 286 (001& 002) Exam 2

The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution guarantees freedom of speech for all individuals and in all cases.

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

According to the lecture, how is the right to free speech often framed?

Strossen argues that censoring pornography would do more harm than good.

The First Amendment protects even speech that violates criminal laws.

Speech counts as “protected” if...

Laws that are designed to suppress the publication of particular viewpoints in the US are reviewed under a judicial standard of:

“Chilling effect” is a term that describes:

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler