Questions
MPU3193.AF1.JAN2023 Fill in the Blanks
Short answer
During a chat with his friends and family, Rahman has raised the sensitive issues by questioning the history of granting Chinese and Indians the Malaysian citizenship, the sovereignty and position of the Malay Rulers, and the special position granted to the indigenous peoples of Sabah and Sarawak. Rahman has clearly violated the Malaysian Constitution since it imposes restrictions on our freedom of [__________].
View Explanation
Verified Answer
Please login to view
Step-by-Step Analysis
The question asks about a constitutional restriction that Rahman may have violated when raising sensitive issues about citizenship history, the sovereignty and position of the Malay Rulers, and the special status of indigenous peoples in Sabah and Sarawak.
Option analysis is not provided here since there are no answer choices to evaluate. Nevertheless, we can reason through the core concept involved in the blank.
- The statement points to the freedom that Rahman is purportedly violating. In many constitutional frameworks, including Malaysia’s, there is a recognized right to freedom of expression or......Login to view full explanationLog in for full answers
We've collected over 50,000 authentic exam questions and detailed explanations from around the globe. Log in now and get instant access to the answers!
Similar Questions
The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution guarantees freedom of speech for all individuals and in all cases.
According to the lecture, how is the right to free speech often framed?
Strossen argues that censoring pornography would do more harm than good.
The First Amendment protects even speech that violates criminal laws.
More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper
Making Your Study Simpler
Join us and instantly unlock extensive past papers & exclusive solutions to get a head start on your studies!