As a result of the implantation of Adam Smith’s theories in food industries:

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question asks: 'As a result of the implantation of Adam Smith’s theories in food industries:'

Option analysis:
- Given information: The provided data includes a single stated answer: 'farmers lost their jobs because of imports.' There are no other answer options supplied to compare or contrast.
- Interpreting the statement: Adam Smith advocated free markets and competition, which in the context of food industries typically means fewer trade barriers and more imports. In many historical and economic discussions, increased imports can challenge local farmers who cannot compete with cheaper foreign production, potentially leading to job losses in farming as production shifts toward imported goods or as farmers consolidate.
- Why this could be considered plausible: If Smithian ideas are applied to reduce tariffs and promote international trade, domestic agriculture may face greater competition from imports, potentially reducing demand for domestic farmers and causing layoffs or shifts away from farming.
- Why this might be incomplete or contestable: Smith’s theories focus broadly on efficiency, division of labor, and voluntary exchange, not only on job losses in agriculture. Depending on context, free market reforms could also encourage alternative sectors within food industries, innovation, or growth in export opportunities for farmers who adapt.
- Addressing the absence of other options: Without the other choices, we cannot evaluate other potential outcomes such as increased efficiency, lower prices for consumers, specialization, or broader economic gains. The single option emphasizes a negative agricultural consequence, which is a valid risk under open competition but not the sole possible outcome of Smithian application.
- Conclusion about the given option: The statement attributes a likely consequence of free-market reforms in food industries to farmer job losses due to imports. This aligns with common critiques of liberalization effects on domestic agriculture, making the option plausible as a correct description in many scenarios. However, for a robust judgment, one would typically compare against other possible outcomes and consider historical context, policy measures, and adaptation by farmers.

FNDN Academic English 2024 STD E3

As a result of the implantation of Adam Smith’s theories in food industries:

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

Free trade is:

What is free trade?

Which of the following statements is TRUE?

What is the best alternative title for this video?