In the United States, the right to free speech:

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

Question restatement: In the United States, the right to free speech:

Option 1: 'Can present an ethical challenge involving technology based on posts on social media.' This option highlights that, in practice, speech facilitated by technology and social media can raise complex ethical considerations, such as moderation, misinformation, privacy concerns, and the balance between free expression and responsible communication.

Option 2: 'Is an absolute privilege to all citizens.' This is not accurate. While the First Amendment protects a broad range of expressive activities, it does not grant an absolute privilege; there are well-established legal limitations (e.g., incitement, true threats, defamation, obscenity) where speech is restricted by law.

Option 3: 'Is a constant threat to every business.' This overstates the reality. Speech rights can affect business operations, advertising, and public discourse, but characterizing free speech as a constant threat to all businesses ignores the protective legal framework that allows many forms of expression in the marketplace and public square, within permitted limits.

Option 4: 'Depends on state law.' While states can shape certain aspects of law and may have their own constitutional provisions or interpretations, the central protection for free speech in the United States comes from the federal First Amendment as applied nationwide. State law cannot wholly override these fundamental rights, though it may offer additional protections or impose specific limitations in other contexts.

Additional nuanced reasoning:
- The First Amendment provides a baseline of protection across the entire country, which means many speech-related protections are uniform, though state courts may interpret and apply them with some variation.
- When evaluating speech, one should consider both prohibitions (like incitement or threats) and permissible restrictions (such as time/place/murpose rules, not targeting viewpoints).
- The interaction with technology underscores the evolving nature of the issue, where platforms, moderation policies, and societal norms influence how the right is exercised in online spaces.

In summary, option 1 most accurately captures a realistic facet of free speech in the United States, given the modern context of social media and technology, while the other statements either misstate the absoluteness of the right or mischaracterize its relationship with state law.

MGS352001.2025FA EXAM II

In the United States, the right to free speech:

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

In its 2011 Snyder v. Phelps ruling, the Supreme Court held that Westboro Baptist Church protests at military funerals

If you know that some law restricts only unprotected speech, what can you conclude based on that fact alone?

Strossen argues that censoring pornography would do more harm than good.

Strossen argues that censoring pornography would do more harm than good.

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler

MGS*3520*01.2025FA EXAM II

In the United States, the right to free speech:

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

In its 2011 Snyder v. Phelps ruling, the Supreme Court held that Westboro Baptist Church protests at military funerals

If you know that some law restricts only unprotected speech, what can you conclude based on that fact alone?

Strossen argues that censoring pornography would do more harm than good.

Strossen argues that censoring pornography would do more harm than good.

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Making Your Study Simpler

MGS352001.2025FA EXAM II