Why might a country with a history of fiscal indiscipline still have an incentive to support strict EU-level fiscal rules, even if compliance is politically costly domestically?

Question

BlackTom AI · Accepted Answer

The question asks why a country with a history of fiscal indiscipline might still support strict EU-level fiscal rules, even if compliance is politically costly at home.
Option a: They act as an external commitment which disciplines domestic policymakers and reduces the risk of overspending. This is correct because international rules create a credible constraint that signals to both markets and policymakers that there is a binding limit or process to prevent excessive deficits, thereby disciplining domestic choices even when rulers face domestic political costs.
Option b: They eliminate the need for the country to explain its fiscal decisions to financial markets. This is incorrect because EU-level rules do not remove market scrutiny; markets continue to monitor compliance and performance, and rules often increase transparency and reporting, not reduce explanation to markets.
Option c: They allow governments to bypass democratic accountability. This is false and misleading: strict rules aim to increasing credibility and discipline, not to circumvent accountability. In fact, bypassing accountability would undermine the legitimacy and effectiveness of the rules.
Option d: They replace national budgets, so national governments can allocate funds more efficiently. This is inaccurate: EU rules do not replace national budgets; budgets are still national responsibilities, and the rules constrain deficits or debt rather than reallocating all funds directly at the national level.

SESS0026_25-26 MCQ TEST (30%) in-class 11th December 2025, 1pm

Why might a country with a history of fiscal indiscipline still have an incentive to support strict EU-level fiscal rules, even if compliance is politically costly domestically?

View Explanation

Log in for full answers

Similar Questions

The main criticism around the effectiveness of the Stability and Growth Pact as a fiscal rule is:

A core limitation of the Stability and Growth Pact highlighted by the Eurocrisis was:

A core limitation of the Stability and Growth Pact highlighted by the Eurocrisis was:

In a consumer society, many adults channel creativity into buying things

Economic stress and unpredictable times have resulted in a booming industry for self-help products

People born without creativity never can develop it

A product has a selling price of $20, a contribution margin ratio of 40% and fixed cost of $120,000. To make a profit of $30,000. The number of units that must be sold is: Type the number without $ and a comma. Eg: 20000

Which of the following statement regarding cost is correct:

More Practical Tools for Students Powered by AI Study Helper

Homework AI Solver

Stylized AI Paper Writer

Plagiarism Checker Assistant

Citation AI Academic Writing Tool

In-Class Translation Assistant

AI Note Generator

AI Quiz Answers

Past Exam Questions from University Test Bank

Smart Practice Assistant

Adaptive Practice

Making Your Study Simpler